BV Area wrestlers win dual tourney
The Belle Vernon Area wrestling team literally pinned the competition Saturday en route to winning the Pittsburgh Central Catholic dual tournament.
The Leopards racked up 33 pins on the day – nearly half of their total individual victory count.
BVA (17-2) scored convincing victories over Highlands, 64-12; Thomas Jefferson, 60-11; Carrick, 75-3; Ripley, W.Va., 61-9; and host Pittsburgh Central Catholic, 69-4.
Leading the way was 113-pounder Tyler Seliga, who won all five of his matches by pinfall. Also going 5-0 on the day were Jacob Dunlop (106 pounds), Brandan Hasson (120), Mitch Hartman (126), Austin Bell (160), Milton Kobaly (182) and Billy Korber (195). Pat Mayernik, a 220-pounder, won all four of his matches.
Going 4-1 at the tournament were Dylan Lundy (132), Cameron Evans (138), and Jarod Verkleeren (145).
BVA is flying high after capturing its first section title Wednesday and will enter the WPIAL Class AAA team playoffs as the No. 10 seed.
The Leopards collide with No. 7 seed Hempfield at 6 p.m. Wednesday at Canon McMillan. The winner will face either the second-seeded Big Macs or the winner of tonight's match between Ringgold and Plum.
BVA is currently No. 7 in the Tribune Review rankings and entered the weekend with brothers Jarod and Derek Verkleeren ranked No. 3 in Class AAA at 145 and 152 pounds respectively.
Rick Bruni Jr. is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org or 724-684-2635.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.