Norwin sophomore Phipps headed back to Hershey
Norwin sophomore Drew Phipps is headed to the PIAA Class AAA Wrestling Championships again.
Phipps fell to Montour senior Cole Macek, 3-1, in overtime in the 195-pound semifinals at the WPIAL and PIAA Class AAA Southwest Regional on Saturday at Canon-McMillan.
It was Phipps' first loss of the season. He enters next weekend's tournament at Hershey with a 23-1 record. He went 1-2 in the 2013 PIAA tournament.
Macek secured a takedown 30 seconds into overtime to earn the hard-fought win.
Phipps earned a return trip to states by rallying to defeat North Allegheny junior Zach Smith, 5-3, in overtime. Phipps trailed 3-1 in the third period, but was able to tilt Smith to his back for a two-point nearfall.
Phipps wasted no time in overtime getting a quick takedown for the win.
West Mifflin senior heavyweight Shawn Devey opened the final day with a pin of Central Catholic senior Adisa Branch, but his dream ended with a loss to Montour sophomore Zack Jablonski.
Canon-McMillan senior Solomon Chishko became the 24th wrestler to win four WPIAL titles with a 9-4 win against Franklin Regional junior Josh Maruca at 145 pounds. Latrobe senior Zack Zavatsky won his third title with a 5-1 win against Mt. Lebanon junior Kellan Stout at 182.
Winning their second titles were Latrobe sophomore Luke Pletcher at 120 and Kiski Area senior Shane Kuhn at 285.
Franklin Regional had three champions: Devin Brown (106), Spencer Lee (113) and Josh Shields (152).
The other winners were Canon-McMillan senior Dalton Macri (126), Penn-Trafford freshman Cameron Coy (132), Central Catholic junior Vincenzo Joseph (138), Belle Vernon sophomore Austin Bell (160), Central Catholic senior Kyle Coniker (170) and Kiski Area sophomore Tyler Worthing (220).
Paul Schofield is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at email@example.com or via Twitter @Schofield_Trib.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.