Norwin's Phipps earns spot in PIAA semifinals
TribLIVE Sports Videos
HERSHEY — For a kid with a spot in the semifinals of the PIAA Class AAA wrestling championships, Norwin sophomore 195-pounder Drew Phipps grappled with an unusual amount of displeasure Friday afternoon at Giant Center.
Phipps (25-1), who went 1-2 in the state tournament a season ago, sits one win away from the PIAA title match. He'll meet Governor Mifflin junior Jan Johnson (42-1) in the semifinals, which begin at 9 a.m. Saturday.
When he steps on the mat again, Phipps hopes to have rediscovered his more aggressive, offensive approach to matches.
One day after beating his first-round opponent in overtime, he again came through in a clutch situation as he scored a takedown in the final 30 seconds of his 3-1 win over Boyertown's Jordan Wertz in the quarterfinals.
“I'm not getting very many shots off, and I don't feel like I'm wrestling my style,” Phipps said. “I feel like I'm hesitating too much. Even the shots I am taking, when I'm not getting them, I'm still able to scramble out, so I should be taking a lot more. But it doesn't feel like they're open or something.
“The quality is just a lot better than you're used to when you get up here.”
Phipps is certain to finish in the top six of his weight class. His sights remain set on a gold medal, though.
“It's a big improvement,” he said of his state tournament improvement from a season ago to now.
“But I feel like I'm not wrestling my best, so I need to step it up for the semifinals and finals.”
Norwin's only PIAA finalist came in 1965, when Tim Morgan placed second in the 95-pound weight class.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.