Valley's Fields penalized for prematch handslap, leading to loss
TribLIVE Sports Videos
HERSHEY — Well aware of the strong competition in his weight class at the PIAA Class AA Championships, Valley senior 182-pounder Terrell Fields expected to surrender points here and there Friday at Giant Center.
But not for slapping an assistant coach's hand before a match.
Fields followed a pre-match routine he said he has followed since his freshman season and consequently violated a rule that cost him a penalty point in his quarterfinal against Bethlehem Catholic senior Jose Ortiz. That penalty point became the foundation for Ortiz's 2-1 win over Fields (35-2), a three-time state qualifier who placed sixth at 182 last season.
The rule Fields violated states that wrestlers must go to the center of the mat once they check in for a match. Leaving the inbounds area, even to simply slap a coach's hand, is a penalty.
“I didn't know something like that could be a rule,” Fields said. “Every match since freshman year, that's what I do. I did it yesterday. I don't know why I'm just hearing about it. I'm sure I'm not the only one who slaps a coach's hand after checking in.”
Though aware of the rule, Vikings coach Steve Ansani questioned the appropriateness of enforcing something he views as a common no-call.
“It's a vague rule, and they haven't been consistent with it at all,” Ansani said. “I've seen numerous kids slapping coaches' hands after they check in at the table. Most referees aren't going to make that call.”
John Hosage, the PIAA's interpreter and supervisor of officials, said he believed the rule was not being ignored by some referees and applied by others. And he made clear that, regardless of Fields' innocent act, Fields violated a rule.
“The match starts when you come to the table,” Hosage said. “You belong to the referees once you report, and you're expected to be ready to wrestle.”
He added: “It's my understanding that (the referees) verbally tried to get him to stop before he could do it, but it didn't work.”
Informed of Hosage's comment about the warning, Ansani said he never heard the referees say anything to Fields.
Handed a lead to start the bout, Ortiz wrestled a cautious, defensive style that Fields and Ansani found almost as frustrating as the enforcement of the hand-slap violation.
“Starting the match up by 1, he didn't have to do anything, so he just waited,” Fields said. “I was caught really off guard by that (penalty), and it really killed my mood. I ran that match through my head three or four times, and in my head, I was going to win 1-0. I was going to ride him out. I'd push, push, push, and he'd be tired, and he wouldn't be able to get out.”
Said Ansani: “Ortiz knows the game, so he just stalled it out. He knew we'd tried to beat him on our feet, so he just clammed up.”
For Fields, a third-place finish in the PIAA still is attainable. He recovered from that quarterfinal loss to beat Hughesville's Matt Herr, 9-2, in a consolation bout.
He'll wrestle again Friday night, when Class AA action resumes at 6:30 p.m.
The consolation win guarantees Fields a medal. Three more wins will get him third place.
“It's over with, and it'd be foolish to still dwell on it,” Fields said of the loss. “I've just got to run the table here. Wrestling back and taking third, there's still a lot of credit there. It's my senior season, and I didn't get where I wanted, but third place isn't bad.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.