Valley wrestlers take unprecedented step at PIAA tournament
HERSHEY — Though none of the three stood as high as they'd hoped on the PIAA Class AA medal stand, Valley seniors Marcus Davenport, Patrick Dewitt and Terrell Fields collectively pushed the Vikings wrestling program to an unprecedented height at the individual championships Saturday at Giant Center.
For the first time in team history, Valley had multiple placewinners at the state tournament. Ten Vikings, including Fields, earned PIAA medals before this season, but never in the same season.
Davenport, a first-time PIAA qualifier, finished fourth in the 195-pound weight class to lead Valley's trio. Fields, Davenport's adopted brother, took fifth at 182, improving his spot on the medal stand by one step from a season ago. And Dewitt, who lost his first-round bout Thursday, battled back to place seventh at 126.
Davenport, a middleweight the previous three seasons, bulked up and began to believe in himself with considerable encouragement from his teammates and coaches this winter.
“They're like 90 percent of the reason I'm here,” he said.
While Valley enjoyed an unprecedented number of placewinners, Burrell savored another strong team performance in a season loaded with them. The Bucs, led by senior 152-pound champion Steve Edwards, junior heavyweight third-place finisher Al Beattie and senior 145-pound fifth-place finisher Corey Falleroni, placed fifth in the team standings, the highest of any WPIAL program.
Kittanning added two placewinners — senior 145-pound champ Jason Nolf and sophomore 220-pound fifth-place finisher Jacob Robb — to the Alle-Kiski Valley total in Class AA.
Kiski Area senior heavyweight Shane Kuhn brought home the area's only PIAA medal, as he placed third for a second straight season.
Bill West is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at firstname.lastname@example.org or via Twitter @BWest_Trib.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.