Hempfield's Krivus again a national champion
Sam Krivus left Hershey last month with a bad taste in his mouth.
And no the Hempfield junior eat some bad chocolate. He was disappointed how he wrestled at the PIAA Class AAA Championships.
Krivus won the 2013 title and was hoping for a repeat performance. But that dream was shattered in the semifinals with a loss to Northampton's Zach Valley in overtime. Then in the third-place match, he lost to Waynesburg's A.C. Headlee.
“Things didn't go as planned at Hershey,” Krivus said. “So I spent the last three weeks training hard and preparing for the FloNationals. I wanted to get back on top of the podium.”
Krivus succeeded in getting back to the top when he won his second consecutive FloNationals title by winning the tough 126-pound weight class at IUP on Saturday. He defeated Valley, 2-1, in the finals and finished 6-0 in the tournament.
He became only the fifth wrestler from the state to win FloNationals twice and he earned his third All-American honor.
Now he's eyeing a third title in 2015, which would make him the first wrestler in the state to achieve the feat. He's also looking to become a four-time All-American.
“I had a slip up at the state tournament,” Krivus said. “But I was more focused at Flo. It was amazing to win again.
“It helped me regain my confidence. I just went out and had fun. Getting back on top was the goal.”
Krivus finished 41-5 during the high school season and is now 126-12 overall. He's a two-time WPIAL champion. He is a three-time PIAA placewinner. He placed third in 2012.
Latrobe sophomore Luke Pletcher, a two-time PIAA champion, was beaten in the finals at the FloNationals. He was a Flo champion in 2013.
Paul Schofield is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at firstname.lastname@example.org or via Twitter @Schofield_Trib.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.