ShareThis Page

Starkey: Don't bury wretched Steelers yet

| Tuesday, Sept. 17, 2013, 10:42 p.m.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Steelers running back Felix Jones carries against the Bengals on Monday, Sept. 16, 2013, at Paul Brown Stadium in Cincinnati.

Cris Carter had the quote of the night Monday. Asked on the ESPN set how much trouble the Steelers are in these days, Carter said, “On a scale of 1-to-10? Let's go Isiah Thomas, No. 11.”

That was before their 20-10 loss.

If it was hard to argue with Carter's assessment then, it's harder now. The Steelers stink. But so does the rest of the AFC, save for the Broncos and maybe the Bengals. I could see the Patriots, Bengals, Texans and Broncos winning their divisions, and then what?

Here's what: A bunch of teams hanging around .500 and hoping to do the Victor Cruz Salsa, circa 2011, come January. That's basically what you need to do in the modern-day NFL — sneak into the playoffs like Cruz's 2011 Giants and get hot.

Sad as they are, the Steelers could hang around. They could even wake up Monday tied for first in the AFC North if they beat the Bears while the Bengals lose to the Packers and the Ravens lose to the Texans. Not an unrealistic scenario.

Still, only three teams since 1990 have gone from 0-3 to the playoffs, which makes Sunday's game feel like a must-win. Tomlin addressed that idea and a bunch of related issues Tuesday on the South Side, his weekly session lasting an unusually long 24:30.

Some of it made sense. Some of it didn't.

Upon further review …

Tomlin on Heath Miller: “We expect him to work fully this week and see where that participation takes us. Now, make no mistake, we're not expecting Heath to step out of a phone booth with a cape on.”

My take: A one-legged Miller would help this offense. Three-quarters of him (Heath Mil) would be wonderful. The whole David Paulson thing isn't really working.

Tomlin on the tripping call against Marcus Gilbert: “It wasn't a trip. But the reality is that those guys are going to miss calls. We have to be good enough to overcome it.”

Take: Well said. The Steelers aren't good enough to overcome bad breaks these days. But let this also be said: That ridiculous call irrevocably changed the complexion of the game. Inexcusable over-officiating.

Tomlin on what's wrong with a running game that has gone eight consecutive games without producing 100 yards: “The problems are many. We lack detail. We lack finish. Hats on hats at times. It's popcorn. And not to say that with a discouraged mind state. I just say that that's a part of things when you're not functioning well, and that we're capable of fixing these things.”

Take: What?

Take II: It's popcorn?

Tomlin: “We have to continue to turn the stones over and look at the men we're utilizing and what we're asking them to do and put them in the most advantageous positions to succeed.”

Take: Surely, putting players in the “most advantageous positions to succeed” can never, ever mean Jerricho Cotchery on an end-around. I asked Tomlin if there had been some confusion in personnel on the play. In other words, was Cotchery even supposed to be in the game, or was that play ticketed for Antonio Brown or Emmanuel Sanders or someone who can, you know, run?

His cryptic answer: “It wasn't a well-executed play. Obviously, we're capable of using other people, but he was the guy in there at that time.”

Tomlin on Felix Jones in the backfield: “I was encouraged by some of the things Felix did.”

Take: I wasn't. Jones gained 14 yards on a give-up, third-and-long draw. His other nine carries netted 23 yards.

Tomlin on the notion of going to a full-time, hurry-up offense: “I don't think it's sustainable in the big picture. I think it's an awesome weapon, … If you're leaning on it heavily, obviously, I think it's going to be exposed in some form or fashion.”

Take: That's fair, but I'd still like to see more of the hurry-up attack — with Roethlisberger calling the plays. It can't get worse than the six three-and-outs we saw Monday night, can it?

Don't answer that.

Joe Starkey co-hosts a show 2 to 6 p.m. weekdays on 93.7 FM. Reach him at

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.