ShareThis Page

Starkey: Chryst still a mystery

| Tuesday, Oct. 29, 2013, 10:39 p.m.
PItt head coach Paul Chryst speaks to the media during a press conference Monday, Aug. 26, 2013, on the South Side.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
PItt head coach Paul Chryst speaks to the media during a press conference Monday, Aug. 26, 2013, on the South Side.

Twenty games into the Paul Chryst regime, the question can fairly be asked: What do we have here?

Might this be the coach to lead Pitt back to national prominence, or is Chryst the latest in a line of men who couldn't get the program over the proverbial hump?

Is he the next Johnny Majors (Part I) or Dave Wannstedt minus the mustache?

Early signs have me concerned, but the only sensible answer comes in the form of another question:

Who knows?

It's way too soon to render a meaningful verdict. We can analyze the early clues, but we must remember that Pitt football was a national punch line when Chryst arrived 23 months ago.

People literally had lost count of the head coaches, including interims, in the 13 months prior to Chryst's hiring Dec. 22, 2011 (for the record, it was five).

Sitting in Pitt's offices Monday, two days after a bad loss at Navy, I asked Chryst about the “long-range vision” he brought to Oakland.

How is it holding up?

“I think some areas where we've made progress haven't necessarily shown up on the field yet,” he said. “Do I think we're making progress? Yes. But you hate to be that guy that's saying ‘Hey, we're making progress.'”

Indeed, as anyone in Pirates management can tell you, maintaining a “long-range vision” is not easy in the early days of rebuilding. People want results, yesterday, and Chryst is just 10-10 through 20 games (8-10 against major college competition).

That isn't much different than Wannstedt (11-9) or Harris (8-12) through 20, with Harris having inherited by far the worst situation.

Chryst's first 23 months have been marked by multiple player defections — and ejections — as he walks the narrow line of trying to win now while laying a solid foundation.

“I want to try to do it the right way,” Chryst said. “Now, that's subjective, right? Because it's my definition of the right way. So someone could say, ‘Boy, that's messed up. That's way wrong.' But I want it to be one of substance and not necessarily looking for the quick fix.”

In that vein, Chryst has scored his biggest points with fans via two off-field moves:

1. Not acquiescing to tailback Rushel Shell.

2. Not going hard after the Wisconsin job.

It seems clear that if Chryst had wanted to return to his native Wisconsin when that job opened after last season, he could have put the hammer down, switched to the left lane and lobbied hard with Wisconsin athletic director Barry Alvarez.


“Yeah,” Chryst said. “But at the same time, Barry knows me. Yeah, you could have gone (after it). But I hadn't done anything here yet. You know what I mean? I do believe in the mission here. I'm confident we can get back to making this a special place on the field.”

Like every coach, Chryst will be as good as the talent he brings in. That has been a challenge, as one would expect under the circumstances. But there are bright spots: Talented freshmen Tyler Boyd and James Conner are among 12 true freshmen contributing.

Early reviews of the 2014 class aren't glowing, but it's not fully formed. Chryst still is building relationships with local coaches and knows only one way to sell himself: humbly.

“I'm not a flashy guy,” he said. “It's going to be substance over sizzle.”

Here's the thing: The substance must include big wins, and those have been scarce. Chryst has lost too many games he was supposed to win and won just one (Virginia Tech last season) where he was expected to lose.

My biggest concern, as it was with Wannstedt, is Chryst's game management — his propensity to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory (a Pitt specialty).

The Navy game provided at least two examples, in addition to Chryst hoarding his timeouts at the end:

• By refusing to take shots downfield, Pitt minimized its athletic advantage.

• Chryst did not challenge the ruling on what appeared to be an obvious Ray Vinopal interception that would have short-circuited a long Navy scoring drive.

All of that is hindsight, of course, and as Harris once memorably put it, “Hindsight is 50/50.” Foresight is what's needed here, and we'll know within a few years whether Paul Chryst's vision was clear.

Nobody could possibly know that yet.

Joe Starkey co-hosts a show 2 to 6 p.m. weekdays on 93.7 FM. Reach him at

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.