Starkey: Snow at the Super Bowl? Noooooo!
TribLIVE Sports Videos
It's party time when the NHL plays outdoors, but the NFL is crazy for trying it?
Is that how this works?
The Detroit Red Wings and Toronto Maple Leafs will hook up New Year's Day at Michigan Stadium (a football stadium) for the Winter Classic, and everybody seems to be excited about it. As well they should be.
I saw a hockey game in the snow — Penguins-Sabres at a football stadium in Buffalo — and it ranks among the top five events I've covered.
I've also seen lots of football games in the snow. I like them best that way. They make for fantastic television. But the instant the NFL announced that Super Bowl XLVIII would be played Feb. 2, 2014, at MetLife Stadium in New Jersey, people started freaking out.
What if it snows?
The possibility of such has become a national obsession.
AccuWeather, which bills itself “The World's Weather Authority” and is headquartered in State College (where it sometimes snows during football games), has constructed a website dedicated to predicting the weather for Feb. 2 in East Rutherford, N.J.
Seriously. It's called willitsnow.com. Its front page has a ticker counting the seconds to Super Sunday, next to a headline that reads “Will it Snow on Feb. 2?”
Since weather people are so reliable, AccuWeather was kind enough to feature four of them hazarding “forecasts” for Feb. 2 in East Rutherford.
One of them, a man named Henry Margusity, wrote the following: “Long-range models remain consistent that a cold front goes through Feb. 1, and behind the front, it's just chilly with a flurry maybe.”
That inspired me to find a meteorologist with some punch: Jon Burnett, KDKA-TV's weekend weather person and former backup defensive end at the University of Tennessee.
Two questions, Jon:
1. Can anybody reasonably predict the weather 40 days away?
Jon: “No. It's completely insane. Like doing brain surgery with your eyes closed.”
2. Do you like the idea of a Super Bowl in the snow?
Jon: “Oh, of course. Some of the great games of all time have been snow games.”
Nothing is worse than climate-controlled football, unless it's climate-controlled baseball. Both are un-American.
So when people rave about, say, the recent SEC title game, I become visibly angry. That was sanitized football at its worst. Auburn and Missouri played on the Georgia Dome's indoor carpeting and combined for 1,211 yards, 99 points and zero grass-stained jerseys.
Is that really what people want? Video-game football?
I tend to associate the sport with the outdoors. Wind. Rain. Sun. Snow. Whatever Mother Nature whips up.
I think of the Steelers beginning their march to Super Bowl XL by pounding the Bears at snowy, muddy Heinz Field, or Cincinnati edging Pitt, 45-44, in an epic battle waged under a light snow that fell like ticker tape.
Near as I can tell, the two arguments against playing the Super Bowl in a place like New Jersey are the possibility bad weather will prevent the “best game possible” and that it's not fair to the paying customers.
The first charge is ridiculous. Refer to Dec. 8, when wintry mixes failed to keep several early NFL games from exploding into the point festivals that so many fans crave. The Philadelphia Eagles scored 28 fourth-quarter points in a blizzard.
Just three days ago, the Steelers and Packers turned a frozen field into a glorious stage for one of the more entertaining games you'll see.
As for the paying customers, who cares? Bring your mittens, kids. Fans at Super Bowl XLI sat through an all-night rain in Miami. Fans at the 1948 NFL title game in Philadelphia brought their own shovels to dig out of a storm. Life stinks.
The NFL, in an effort to assuage fears, mapped out its snow contingency plans last week in New Jersey. It even rolled out a snow-melting machine called “Aero,” which apparently can melt 600 tons of snow in an hour — you know, in case a scene from “The Day After Tomorrow” breaks out. The league claims it is willing to move the Super Bowl to Saturday, Monday or Tuesday.
Please. As Giants quarterback Eli Manning said, “Just go play it.”
I hope it snows like crazy.
Joe Starkey co-hosts a show 2 to 6 p.m. weekdays on 93.7 FM. Reach him at email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Steelers’ Martavis Bryant facing four-game suspension
- Pennsylvania warming to bring ‘profound’ changes, Penn State report says
- Animal Rescue League, miffed at Vick signing, moves gala from Heinz Field
- Steelers notebook: Tomlin leaving `light on’ for injured players
- Gorman: Don’t judge WPIAL by the cover
- Penguins notebook: Crosby most excited by Kessel’s footspeed
- Former Consol employee wins nearly $587K in ‘Mark of the Beast’ lawsuit
- Pirates notebook: Hurdle mulling rotation options
- Two flown from Bullskin accident scene
- Class AAAA breakdown: Wealth of talent places target on Central Catholic
- Kane: Emails released not everything she wants to make public