ShareThis Page

Starkey: Pitt's new QB mighty intriguing

| Saturday, March 1, 2014, 9:00 p.m.

The new quarterback will be the major storyline when Pitt opens spring practice March 16. It's a juicy one.

Redshirt sophomore Chad Voytik has provided just enough material to make you wonder if he might be something special — or at least the kind of entertainer Pitt rarely has at the position.

The tape on Voytik includes only last year's spring game and the second half of the Little Caesars Bowl. So the competition — Pitt and Bowling Green — wasn't overwhelming. But give him this much: He makes a wonderful first impression and an even better second one.

Voytik completed 27 of 33 passes for 358 yards and three touchdowns in the spring game. He engineered a dramatic comeback win in the bowl game. That gave him one more comeback win than Tino Sunseri provided in three years.

But it wasn't just the victory. It was the way the 6-foot Voytik played. He looked like Johnny Manziel. He coolly sidestepped a defender in the end zone to make a first-down throw. He used his 4.53 speed to race 19 yards up the sideline on a designed run. He unleashed a 62-yard bomb to Tyler Boyd despite a self-described “average” arm. He displayed a quick release. He scored on a 5-yard bootleg.

It's easy to forget Voytik was a four-star recruit out of Cleveland, Tenn., good enough to get invited to the prestigious “Elite 11” quarterback camp in Malibu, Calif. He was the guy Fraud Graham hand-picked to run his spread offense.

That was before Graham put the hammer down and bolted for Arizona State. Voytik wondered whether he should transfer to another school. His impulse was to go. New coach Paul Chryst changed his thinking. Voytik knew of Chryst's work with another undersized quarterback, Russell Wilson, and opted to stay.

Voytik spoke about all of this a few days ago at Pitt's South Side football offices. He sounded wise beyond his years.

“I said all along I came to Pitt for more than just the football aspect,” he said. “As we know, college football is a business. Say you go to a different school. What's telling you that coach won't leave?”

Voytik believes Chryst will allow him to play the position creatively, and the playbook will include plenty of designed quarterback runs — something rarely seen in these parts. Voytik can't wait to get started with an offense that should include a variety of weapons, starting with Boyd.

“I think I'm better off in this offense with Coach Chryst teaching me than I would have been in more of a Todd Graham-style offense,” he said. “I can honestly say that.”

Say this, too: The kid operates with a chip on his shoulder. He grew up a big Tennessee fan but never got an offer from that school, despite being the No. 1-ranked quarterback in the state.

“It was my dream,” Voytik said. “I'm a little bitter I didn't have the opportunity to explore that option. I'm not like holding a picture of Smokey (Tennessee's mascot) and getting mad every night, but it's definitely back there somewhere.”

The mission now is to build excitement around a Pitt program that has generated such little buzz that it moved its spring game to high school stadiums in recent years and now has canceled it altogether.

Voytik knows. He hates the sight of a half-empty stadium. He pauses to consider most of his answers but replies quickly and firmly when asked if he wonders what it would be like to play in front of packed houses.

“Yeah, and I told myself, ‘We need to change this,' ” he said. “I've been to the Tennessees and Alabamas with 100,000-plus people. I've been to an Alabama spring game with 102,000 people. We just need to bring the excitement to fill the stadium.”

An entertaining quarterback would be a large step in that direction.

An electrifying one would be a guarantee.

Joe Starkey co-hosts a show 2 to 6 p.m. weekdays on 93.7 FM. Reach him at

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.