ShareThis Page

Starkey: Pirates must prioritize keeping Russell Martin

| Tuesday, July 8, 2014, 9:57 p.m.
Pirates catcher Russell Martin goes onto the dugout railing for a foul ball, as manager Clint Hurdle assists during the ninth inning against the Cubs Wednesday, June, 11, 2014, at PNC Park.
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Pirates catcher Russell Martin goes onto the dugout railing for a foul ball, as manager Clint Hurdle assists during the ninth inning against the Cubs Wednesday, June, 11, 2014, at PNC Park.

The Pirates stepped out of character to sign Russell Martin once. They must do so again. Or at least make a good-faith attempt. ASAP.

One could easily make the case that aside from Andrew McCutchen, Martin has been the team MVP since he walked through the door before last season. He is the club's highest-paid player at $9.5 million (fifth-highest salary among catchers) and is earning every penny.

Team president Frank Coonelly considers Martin “extraordinarily important” and gauges the club's interest level in retaining him as “very high.”

Will that translate into a fair-market offer? Something north of $10 million per year on, say, a three-year deal?

Based on the Pirates' history, you should be skeptical. Based on their history with Martin, there could be hope.

By history, I mean this: The Pirates identified Martin as a critical missing piece at a premium position two winters ago. This prompted them to break form and move quickly in writing a significant free-agent check (two years, $17 million).

The Pirates showed Martin the money while his former team, the New York Yankees, hesitated.

That same two-step logic should apply again:

A.) Man plays critically important position.

B.) Offer him fair-market value.

It's hard to win a World Series without an impact catcher. Since the turn of the millennium, it's been mostly guys named Posey, Posada, Varitek, Rodriguez, Molina (Yadier and Bengie), Ruiz and Pierzynski.

At this point, it's hard to picture the Pirates without Martin. It'd be one thing if 2009 first-round pick Tony Sanchez were ready. That would be the ideal succession plan. But Sanchez might never be ready defensively.

The idea now could be to make Martin, 31, the bridge from here to Reese McGuire, another first-round pick who just turned 19.

So start talking. It couldn't hurt. As Martin said, “I'd be stupid not to listen.”

Martin might well price himself out of town. He has earned the right to do whatever he wants. He likely will be the most attractive catcher on the open market.

But if the Pirates are fair, he will listen hard.

“I love this team. I love my teammates,” Martin told me recently. “This is the most fun I've had playing baseball, because of the team we have. And that's really important to me, the people you surround yourself with. That's more important than a lot of things in life.

“So I'm definitely happy here and definitely interested. How could I not be? This is a nice home for me, as far as the chemistry and everything moving in the right direction. I want to keep that direction going.”

The risk would be that Martin's skills erode as he moves well into his 30s. That's a legitimate concern, given the demands of the position, but catchers significantly older than him (Carlos Ruiz, A.J. Pierzynski, to name two) remained impact players well into their 30s, and Martin keeps himself in impeccable shape.

He also has retained a high degree of athleticism. Look at some of the plays he makes. Did you see him jump like a cat onto the dugout ledge in a game last month?

Manager Clint Hurdle did — and quickly became a spotter. Hurdle's first thought was protecting his catcher (and perhaps the hope of a fruitful season) at all costs.

“I'm thinking, ‘There's no way he's gonna drop on my watch,' ” Hurdle told reporters the next day. “And then when he didn't, I expected him to do a reverse-flip dismount and stick the landing.”

Hurdle couldn't say enough about Martin. He spoke of how Martin “laid into” some of the underperforming pitchers after coming off the disabled list and how Martin's trips to the mound are as important as any from the pitching coach.

Martin's tangibles include his pitch-framing skills, his overall defensive abilities and this year his knack for getting on base. The other stuff wouldn't matter without the numbers.

But the other stuff as much as some baseball observers scoff, is hugely important within the clubhouse.

As Jason Grilli told me before he was traded, “It's like osmosis when you're around him. He just exudes confidence in himself. I know he's definitely made our staff better.”

Goodness knows, the Pirates have budgeted tightly enough to where they should be able to splurge from time to time. They did so once for Martin.

They should do so again.

Joe Starkey co-hosts a show 2 to 6 p.m. weekdays on 93.7 FM. Reach him at

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.