Share This Page

Starkey: Pitt does its duty

| Saturday, Aug. 30, 2014, 10:06 p.m.
Chaz Palla | Trib Total Media
Pitt running back James Conner breaks off a 60-yard run against Delaware in the second quarter Saturday, Aug. 30, 2014, at Heinz Field.

This is what you're supposed to do when a team as bad as Dreadful Delaware comes to town.

You're supposed to tear it apart, limb by limb, the instant the national anthem ends. You're supposed to eat it alive. You're supposed to render it hopeless. You're supposed to be wiping your mouth and ordering dessert by halftime.

So, good for Pitt. The Panthers did what they were supposed to do. They jumped to a 42-0 halftime lead and cruised to a 62-0 shutout of the Fightin' Blue Hens under fabulous blue skies Saturday at Heinz Field. No Pitt team had won by that many points since Jackie Sherrill's 1977 outfit trampled Temple, 76-0.

If you've been following Pitt for any length of time, you know it doesn't always do what it's supposed to do. Rather, it specializes in creating drama where drama shouldn't exist.

In the Paul Chryst era alone, the Panthers have dropped a season opener to Youngstown State (Pitt's only loss to an FCS opponent) and looked horrible in a too-close-for-comfort home game against Old Dominion.

On this day, Pitt outgained the opponent, 501-64, and its two best players were unstoppable from the start. Tyler Boyd went video-game crazy in the first half before leaving with a dislocated finger sustained on a punt return (I was told it was his left pinky). James Conner bulldozed his way to 153 yards and four touchdowns in the first 24 minutes.

But we knew those guys were good.

Boyd is just a breathtaking talent who nearly scored the first time he touched the ball — a punt return where he split two defenders and broke three tackles. He nearly scored the second time, too, on a jet sweep that looked dead until Boyd suddenly was sprinting down the left sideline. Only a shoestring tackle stopped him. He also made a diving touchdown catch.

Then came the injury, which set the Twitter-sphere ablaze. Folks were blaming Chryst for letting Boyd return a punt with a 28-0 lead.

What's the issue? There were still seven minutes left in the first half. You don't stop competing with your best players that early. As mentioned, you want the game finished by halftime. You never want to give a team life, which Kevin Weatherspoon's fumble on the previous Delaware punt nearly did.

Boyd, by all indications, should be OK. He was said to be joking in the locker room before the end of the first half and indicated to teammates the injury was not a big deal.

“I think he'll be fine,” quarterback Chad Voytik said.

I asked Chryst if he had any second thoughts about putting Boyd under a punt with a four-touchdown lead.

“No, no,” Chryst said. “Tyler got hurt carrying the ball, and we're going to put him in that position a lot.”

Pretty good line, right? Chryst had a better one in the postgame media room when the television to his right was repeating his words on a delay.

“It's bad enough I gotta talk,” he said, “and then to hear it again?”

As for his team, what could really be gleaned on a day like this? You saw the opponent. Dreadful Delaware was as bad as advertised. This is a team that lost to Navy and Maine by a combined score of 113-35 last season, a team that was called for delay of game as it lined up for the second-half kickoff.

Voytik, making his first career start, didn't get a chance to show much because Chryst rightly stayed with a dominant ground game. Voytik went 10 for 13 for 84 yards and two touchdowns.

We'll know a lot more about the Panthers on Friday night, when they visit Boston College. They'll need Boyd, for sure, because even if BC isn't exactly Florida State, it's not Dreadful Delaware. The exhibition season's done.

It was fun.

Stuff gets real Friday.

Joe Starkey co-hosts a show 2 to 6 p.m. weekdays on 93.7 FM. Reach him at jraystarkey@gmail.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.