ShareThis Page

Gorman: Counting on more milestone moments from Crosby

| Thursday, Feb. 16, 2017, 10:09 p.m.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Penguins' Sidney Crosby celebrates his 1,000th point against the Jets in the first period Thursday, Feb. 16, 2017 at PPG Paints Arena.

Sidney Crosby had not yet scored his 1,000th NHL point when the conversation shifted to the future.

Now that Sid the Kid was closing in on the milestone before his 30th birthday, did it give him a greater appreciation for the accomplishments of the NHL's all-time scoring leaders?

“As a player, you appreciate when you see some of those big numbers how hard it is,” Crosby said before a 4-3 win over Winnipeg on Thursday at PPG Paints Arena — a victory he facilitated with an overtime goal. “You have a lot of respect for the guys who are getting those kind of numbers, but I don't try to compare or anything like that.”

The 1,000th point came on a play that was quintessential Crosby: He fought off Blake Wheeler for the puck, spun sharply and slid a pass to Chris Kunitz in the slot for a 2-0 lead at 6 minutes, 28 seconds of the first period.

The best part isn't that Crosby became the 86th player in league history to cross the 1,000-point threshold. It's that he did it on home ice in front of Penguins fans.

We became accustomed to witnessing these milestone moments, with Paul Coffey, Mario Lemieux, Ron Francis, Joey Mullen and Jaromir Jagr scoring their 1,000th points while with the Penguins.

But this was the biggest since Lemieux reached 1,000 assists in February 2003. As Lemieux approached that mark, I asked the Penguins co-owner how much finishing among the NHL's all-time scorers meant to his legacy.

Lemieux was surprisingly candid, saying the only record he had a shot to break was Wayne Gretzky's 894 goals.

“That's just a by-product of me playing at a high level for most of my career,” Lemieux said. “Those numbers are nice, but the longer I play, the higher they're going to get.”

Lemieux, of course, already had six scoring titles, two Stanley Cup championships and was a member of the Hockey Hall of Fame. He had returned from retirement and was in the twilight of a career that produced 1,723 points, so he possessed a unique perspective.

Lemieux scored 100 points in his first six seasons before injuries and illness interrupted, Crosby in four of his first five before he was concussed.

Crosby is still in his prime, still the league's leading goal scorer and again the world's greatest player. He's too caught up in the moment to truly appreciate the achievement, as it's merely a means to an end to his goal of winning.

So, Crosby can't comprehend playing into his 40s, like teammate Matt Cullen — let alone the longevity of Jagr, who scored his 1,900th NHL point Wednesday, his 45th birthday.

“That's an amazing accomplishment, but, at the same time, you play the game to win,” Crosby said. “You want to be productive. You want to be at your best. If that means producing, that's great, but I don't think that's something that's necessarily a driving force for me when I'm training in the summer, getting ready for the season. I want to produce, but I want to win. Points are kind of a product of that, but that's not what you play for.”

When asked if his two Stanley Cup titles were more rewarding, Crosby stopped short of saying so.

“That's what you play for. You dream of playing in the NHL. You dream of winning the Stanley Cup,” he said. “Growing up, you don't necessarily think you're going to get 1,000 points. It's something that's an opportunity and you're happy to be in this position, but that's what you play for.”

Where Lemieux admitted to peeking at the NHL's career scoring leaders late in his career, Crosby claims not to know where the game's greats rank. His childhood idols, Steve Yzerman (seventh place, 1,755 points) and Joe Sakic (ninth, 1,641) sandwich Lemieux on the top 10.

The prospect of playing long enough to score another 700-plus points was almost as unimaginable to the Penguins captain as the possibility that he would regain his status as the game's greatest after missing the majority of two seasons.

Of course, Crosby knows that his mentality, as well as his motivation, could change in the coming years.

Lemieux congratulated Crosby, saying in a statement, “I'm sure there are plenty more (points) coming.”

Penguins coach Mike Sullivan believes the 1,000-point milestone is as much a reflection of a player's character as it is his competitiveness — both traits that could continue into Crosby's 30s.

“I think what allows players to evolve with the game and play into their elder years is their hockey IQ. It makes up for a lot,” Sullivan said. “Sid's still a young. He's still got legs in him. From my experience being around him, he's an elite player, but what separates Sid from other players is just his ability to create offense in different ways.

“He can beat you with his speed game. He can beat you with a power game or a finesse game. He passes the puck as well as he scores. He's adaptable. He can play with whoever we put him with. He has the ability to adapt and make his line effective. He's just an elite player in every aspect of the game.”

An elite player who has joined an exclusive club. It's what we have come to expect of Crosby, who has gone from Sid the Kid to a man of milestone moments.

This one was grand.

Hopefully, more will follow.

Kevin Gorman is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at or via Twitter @KGorman_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.