Prospect watch: Aliquippa's Dravon Henry a defensive draw
Aliquippa's Dravon Henry eludes Beaver Falls' Trey Hall during the third quarter Friday September 9, 2011 at Reeves Field.
Photo by Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
6-foot, 185 pounds, RB-S, Aliquippa
Dravon Henry knows his reputation is as a running back, one who rushed for 1,465 yards and 18 touchdowns as a sophomore for the WPIAL Class AA champions.
There's a reason Henry has an entire highlight video dedicated to his defensive plays. He led the WPIAL with nine interceptions, and his highlights feature him zig-zagging through opponents to return three for touchdowns and two others inside the 10-yard line.
“Most likely, I want to go to college to play safety,” Henry said. “I'm going to keep contributing on offense in high school, do the best I can do to win a state championship. You see guys like Darrelle Revis and Ty Law who went to college as a DB. I want to do that, too.”
Henry already has scholarship offers from Cincinnati, Kent State, Maryland, Michigan State, Rutgers and West Virginia. He has Division-I lineage, counting Arno “Chad” Askew as an uncle and Revis, Charles Fisher and Dionte Henry among his first cousins.
“They teach me little things: backpedaling, getting out of breaks faster, how to attack the ball in the air better,” Henry said. “One day, I'm hoping to follow in their footsteps.”
Aliquippa coach Mike Zmijanac believes it's too early to compare Henry to past Quips greats, but notes that he was talented enough to start as a freshman and play a starring role last fall, when he was the only sophomore selected to the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review Terrific 25.
“He has a great, intuitive attitude plus he's very strong,” Zmijanac said. “To play that position and do well at it, you have to be physical. I think that's his best attribute right now.”
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.