Gorman: Football coach Nola embraces a new challenge at Gateway
Tom Nola is accustomed to a legend looming, whether the name on the stadium is Clairton's Neil C. Brown or Gateway's Pete Antimarino.
Nola knows that coaching at a traditional WPIAL power comes with greater expectations.
Winning isn't enough.
Clairton won six WPIAL Class A and four PIAA championships and set a state record with a 66-game winning streak under Nola, yet he was a polarizing figure among Bears fans.
So, Nola chased a new challenge by becoming Gateway's third coach in as many seasons.
“It was difficult leaving,” Nola said Monday after his first full-contact practice of training camp. “The streak had ended, and I wanted to try a bigger school with some tradition of winning. I wanted to see what it's like.”
Nola has told his team that the expectation is to play at Heinz Field, home of the WPIAL finals.
“It's a lot easier said than done,” said Gateway defensive line coach Shayne Hale, who starred on the '07 finalists, “but (Nola) knows how to win.”
Winning wasn't enough for Gateway when Terry Smith led the Gators to four WPIAL runner-up finishes between 2004-09.
Winning wasn't enough for Gateway when Donnie Militzer led the Gators to the WPIAL quarterfinals last year.
If expectations are greater now that Gateway has dropped from Class AAAA to Class AAA, they also might be more unrealistic.
There aren't many pushovers scheduled. Central Valley, Thomas Jefferson and two-time defending champion West Allegheny could await in the playoffs.
Yet Gateway expects a title.
“I hope I can bring that,” Nola said. “I think that's why they hired me, because of my previous experience and the winning we did at Clairton.
“Now I'm a Gator, though.”
That has a nice ring, just not the kind Gateway wants.
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.