ShareThis Page
MLB

Astros' Jose Altuve, Marlins' Giancarlo Stanton win MVP awards

| Thursday, Nov. 16, 2017, 8:35 p.m.

Miami Marlins right fielder Giancarlo Stanton and Houston Astros second baseman Jose Altuve, two players separated by 80 pounds of heft, a foot of height and 24 team-wins in the 2017 standings, were named most valuable players of the National and American Leagues, respectively, Thursday night, in votes that were equally divergent in terms of their competitiveness.

Stanton, the towering slugger whose 59 homers were the most in 16 years, prevailed over Cincinnati's Joey Votto in the fourth-closest MVP vote in history. Both received 10 of a possible 30 first-place votes, but Stanton received one additional second-place vote and one more third-place vote than Votto to win by two total points.

"You remember the thoughts you had as a kid, when times were good and bad in the minors and everything building up," Stanton said of his journey to this point, during a conference call Thursday night, "and you finally sit and give thanks for that."

Six players received first-place votes in the NL — the others were Paul Goldschmidt (four), Charlie Blackmon (three), Nolan Arenado (two) and Kris Bryant (one) —­­ the most since 1979, when Keith Hernandez and the Pirates' Willie Stargell ended up tying for MVP.

In the AL, Altuve, the diminutive hit machine who helped the Astros to the franchise's first World Series title last month, won in a rout, taking 27 of the possible 30 first-place votes in balloting by members of the Baseball Writers' Association of America, to easily outpace New York Yankees right fielder Aaron Judge.

Listed as 5-foot-6, Altuve became the smallest NL MVP in history; two previous AL winners, Phil Rizzuto in 1950 and Bobby Shantz in 1952, also were listed as 5-6. The Astros signed him at 16 out of Venezuela for just $15,000 in 2007, after he had failed one tryout but his father persuaded the team to give him a second chance.

"I always dreamed to be a big leaguer. I always dreamed to be a World Series champion," Altuve said on MLB Network. "But I'm not sure if in my dreams I would be an MVP."

The NL vote was marked by a shift away from traditional thinking that equated "value" with carrying a winning team to the playoffs and that rarely awarded players from losing teams. Stanton's Marlins and Votto's Reds finished below .500 and were a combined 44 games out of first place, but few voters appeared to penalize them for that.

Stanton, whose homer total was the most since Barry Bonds hit a record 73 and Sammy Sosa blasted 64 in 2001, became just the third player from a losing team to win the NL award, joining Andre Dawson and Ernie Banks (twice).

Three Washington Nationals finished in the top 12 of NL balloting, led by third baseman Anthony Rendon, who finished sixth. Ace Max Scherzer, who was named the NL's Cy Young Award winner Wednesday, finished 10th and right fielder Bryce Harper was 12th. Second baseman Daniel Murphy received one ninth-place and one 10th-place vote, and first baseman Ryan Zimmerman received a single 10th-place vote.

The AL vote pitted Judge's raw power — his 52 homers this season smashed the rookie record and lifted him to a unanimous victory for AL rookie of the year — against Altuve's all-around brilliance. Altuve won his third AL batting title, hitting a career-high .346, but also boosted his on-base percentage (. 410) and slugging percentage (. 547) to career highs and stole 32 bases in 38 attempts.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.