Share This Page
MLB

MLB notebook: Officials will study replay during WBC, camps

| Tuesday, March 5, 2013, 7:15 p.m.

• Major League Baseball intends to expand the use of instant replay for the 2014 season and will be studying which calls to review and how to do it. Joe Torre, an MLB executive vice president, said that league officials plan to visit Miami during the World Baseball Classic and spring training sites to examine camera angles and other factors that will help them develop a plan.

• There suddenly seem to be some questions about Hall of Fame pitcher Nolan Ryan's future with the Rangers. Speculation has been growing about Ryan, the team's president, since some routine promotions announced last week. General manager Jon Daniels and chief operating officer Rick George were given new presidential titles by Rangers ownership.

• The U.S. team played to a 4-4 tie with the White Sox in the first of two exhibition games leading up to the World Baseball Classic. First baseman Mark Teixeira will miss the tournament after straining his right forearm while swinging in the batting cage before the game.

• Jose Reyes, Hanley Ramirez and Robinson Cano homered, and the Dominican Republic amassed 28 hits in a 15-2 romp over Phillies.

• Three-time MVP Albert Pujols hit a pair of groundouts and struck out in his first spring training appearance of the year for the Angels, a 6-4 win over the Reds.

• Cardinals shortstop Rafael Furcal, 35, is getting a second opinion on his ailing elbow. General manager John Mozeliak said Furcal would be examined Wednesday by Dr. James Andrews. Furcal is out indefinitely after reinjuring the elbow he hurt late last season.

• Jail records said Red Sox left-hander Drake Britton was arrested in Fort Myers, Fla., for driving under the influence.

— AP

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.