ShareThis Page

Passive Pirates hitters racking up Ks

| Saturday, April 13, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

Pirates hitters are off to the worst start in franchise history, holding the lowest team batting average (.175) through the club's first 10 games, and placing second lowest in on-base percentage (.252) and slugging percentage (.247) . The 2013 Pirates have outscored just the Marlins, who over the winter sold off all assets not bolted down in their new ballpark in Little Havana.

Strikeouts are a major reason the Pirates have plated only 27 runs through Friday's games. They lead the National League in punchouts and best just former NL Central doormat Houston among all major league teams.

Special K

Highest team strikeout rates for hitters:

Team Strikeout pct.

Astros 28.8

Pirates 25.2

Braves 24.4

Cubs 24.1

Reds 22.5

MLB avg. 19.9


The Pirates aren't really pressing at the plate, as their collective swing rate on pitches outside the strike zone (29.5 percent) is around the MLB average (28.5 percent). If anything, the Bucs are being too passive and falling behind in the count. They're swinging at the lowest percentage of pitches in the strike zone in the majors.

Select choice

Lowest swing rates against pitches in strike zone:

Team Swing pct.

Pirates 58.1

Indians 58.5

Twins 60.4

Mets 60.8

Blue Jays 61.6

MLB avg. 64.4

Team strikeout leader Pedro Alvarez has swung at a decent number of in-zone pitches (66.7 percent), but Starling Marte (56.9 percent) and Neil Walker (59.4 percent) are striking out often with a more passive approach.

David Golebiewski is a freelance writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.