Share This Page
MLB

MLB notebook: No punishment yet for Dodgers-D'backs brawl

| Wednesday, June 12, 2013, 8:57 p.m.

• A source told ESPN that punishment or suspensions stemming from Tuesday's brawl between the Dodgers and Diamondbacks would not be announced until Thursday. Six men, including Arizona manager Kirk Gibson and Dodgers star rookie Yasiel Puig, were ejected after the prolonged bench-clearing scuffle.

• A judge refused for a second time to dismiss a lawsuit filed by Major League Baseball against a South Florida clinic and its operators over allegations they provided banned substances to players. Circuit Judge Ronald Dresnick on Wednesday denied the dismissal motion filed by the attorney for Carlos Acevedo, who managed a clinic called Biokem. That clinic was the predecessor to now-closed Biogenesis of America, which along with former operator Anthony Bosch is the main target of the MLB lawsuit. The lawsuit contends the clinic and Bosch solicited players to purchase or use banned performance enhancing substances in violation of their contracts with MLB.

• ESPN reported that the Dodgers and Diamondbacks will open the 2014 regular season with two games in Australia. The games will be played March 22-23 at the Sydney Cricket Ground.

• The Padres recalled outfielder Jaff Decker from Triple-A Tucson and placed center fielder Cameron Maybin (knee)on the 15-day disabled list.

• The Nationals recalled former Pirates right-hander Ross Ohlendorf from Triple-A Syracuse, and he started Wednesday night at Colorado.

— Wire reports

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.