ShareThis Page

MLB notebook: A-Rod meets with league officials, goes 0 for 3

| Saturday, July 13, 2013, 8:33 p.m.

Alex Rodriguez went 0 for 3 with two strikeouts for the Tampa Yankees on Saturday, dropping to 2 for 18 (.111) with one RBI and five strikeouts in his injury rehabilitation assignment.

One day after meeting with MLB officials probing the distribution of banned performance-enhancing drugs, the Yankees third baseman played seven innings in the field. He also was hit in the lower back by a pitch.

The meeting took place before Friday's game was rained out. It was not known whether Rodriguez refused to answer MLB's questions.

Phils' Revere breaks foot

Phillies center fielder Ben Revere broke his right foot on a foul ball before grounding into a game-ending double play in the opener of a day-night doubleheader against the White Sox.

Altuve inks 4-year deal

The Astros signed second baseman Jose Altuve to a four-year contract through 2017.

Altuve's deal includes club options for 2018 and 2019. reported the deal is worth $12.5 million for four years, with the two club options worth $6 million and $6.5 million.

Extra bases

Brett Lawrie (ankle) was activated from the 15-day disabled list by the Blue Jays after missing almost two months. ... The White Sox called up left-hander Donnie Veal from Triple-A Charlotte. ... The Cubs claimed outfielder Cole Gillespie off waivers from the Giants.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.