Rangers land Garza from Cubs for prospects
The Cubs traded pitcher Matt Garza to the Rangers on Monday, July 22, 2013.
Photo by Getty Images
ARLINGTON, Texas — The Texas Rangers finally have Matt Garza in their starting rotation.
Texas acquired Garza from the Chicago Cubs in a trade completed Monday, getting a pitcher they long had coveted just more than a week before the July 31 non-waiver trading deadline and several days after it initially appeared that the teams had a deal in place.
“He's an extremely talented pitcher that's had success in the toughest of divisions and the biggest of stages, who's throwing the ball as well as anybody right now,” Rangers general manager Jon Daniels said. “It's a power repertoire, a little bit of a different look from what we've got, and he was available.”
The 29-year-old right-hander provides a boost to a starting rotation plagued by injuries and a team that has slipped three games behind Oakland in the AL West.
Texas sent the Cubs rookie right-hander Justin Grimm, top prospect third baseman Mike Olt and Single-A pitcher C.J. Edwards. There also will be at least one player to be named later, possibly two, depending on who is chosen by Chicago.
“We paid a steep price in talent to acquire Matt, but we did so knowing that we've got other guys in the system,” Daniels said.
Garza (6-1, 3.17 ERA), who can become a free agent after this season, has made 11 starts since missing the first seven weeks this season with a strained left lat muscle. He is 5-0 with a 1.24 ERA his last six starts.
Garza had been scheduled to start Monday night for the Cubs in Arizona. He instead will start for the Rangers against the New York Yankees, likely Wednesday night.
Daniels said Garza was scheduled to fly from Arizona to Texas later Monday night and join the Rangers on Tuesday.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.