MLB notebook: Expanded instant replay could come as soon as next year
• Commissioner Bud Selig could announce as early as Thursday whether Major League Baseball is prepared to implement all-encompassing replay for the 2014 season. Selig, along with baseball's executive council, was formally briefed on replay Wednesday by MLB vice president Joe Torre, Braves president John Schuerholz and advisor Tony La Russa. The owners must approve expanded instant replay by a 75 percent vote. It would then have to be negotiated between the MLB Players Association and the umpires union.
• The Royals acquired versatile Emilio Bonifacio from the Blue Jays for cash or a player to be named later. Bonifacio was traded to the Blue Jays from the Marlins last offseason, and was hitting .218 with three homers and 12 stolen bases. He's played all three outfield spots but can also play second base and third base, two positions of importance for the Royals.
• The Blue Jays put outfielder Colby Rasmus on the 15-day disabled list with a strained left abdominal muscle. Rasmus is hitting .273 with 18 home runs and 60 RBI.
• The Rays aren't sure when injured All-Star left-hander Matt Moore (elbow) will rejoin the rotation. He had hoped to return this weekend but struggled Wednesday during a 55-pitch bullpen session. He said he won't throw again until Sunday.
• Mets right-hander Jeremy Hefner was placed on the DL with a partially torn medial collateral ligament in his right elbow.
• Jake Arrieta will join the Cubs' rotation Friday, with Carlos Villanueva shifting to the bullpen.
— Wire reports
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.