Marlins right-hander Alvarez no-hits Tigers in season finale
MIAMI — The Tigers are saving their hits for the playoffs.
With their postseason slot already decided as AL Central champions, the Tigers watched the other team do all the celebrating Sunday, when Henderson Alvarez pitched a no-hitter and the Marlins scored in the bottom of the ninth to win, 1-0.
The only run scored when Luke Putkonen threw a wild pitch with two outs and the bases loaded in the ninth. The Marlins mobbed Alvarez, who had been standing in the on-deck circle because he was due to bat next.
The Tigers played with a patchwork lineup, but didn't begrudge Alvarez or the Marlins for celebrating.
“It was exciting for them and it was very special for him, so you have to be happy for that, no matter what side you're on,” Tigers infielder Hernan Perez said.
The no-hitter was the first for the Marlins since Anibal Sanchez — now with the Tigers — threw one in 2006 against Arizona.
Sanchez watched from the visitors' dugout as fellow Venezuelan Alvarez celebrated the feat.
With the Tigers' playoff slot settled, they rested four starters and had pulled three others by the seventh inning. Miguel Cabrera, who won his third consecutive batting title, never stepped to the plate.
Marlins manager Mike Redmond said of Alvarez: “He had a lot of movement, and he fed off the fact they were swinging aggressively,”
Alvarez (5-6) struck out four, walked one and hit a batter.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.