ShareThis Page

Price, Longoria lead Rays over Rangers in AL tiebreaker

| Monday, Sept. 30, 2013, 11:42 p.m.

ARLINGTON, Texas — Evan Longoria and David Price powered the Rays into the postseason with a 5-2 win over the Rangers in a tiebreaking game Monday night at Rangers Ballpark.

The Rays (92-71) move on to the American League wild-card game Wednesday night against the Indians in Cleveland.

Tampa Bay is in the playoffs for the fourth time in the past six years, the second time as a wild-card entrant.

The Rays also got a measure of revenge against Texas, which beat Tampa Bay in the AL Division Series in 2010 and '11.

The Rangers, bidding for a fourth straight postseason appearance, won seven consecutive regular-season games to force their way into the tiebreaker.

Going into the game, Longoria said the Rays “had something to prove in Texas,” referring to the previous postseason losses.

Longoria proved it with three hits, including a two-run homer, and two runs.

Price (10-8) also exorcised a few demons. The reigning AL Cy Young Award winner threw a complete game to double his career win total against the Rangers.

He began the night 1-7 with a 6.62 ERA against Texas in the regular season and postseason combined.

The left-hander, who went the distance for the fifth time this season, allowed seven hits and one walk. He struck out four.

Texas rookie starter Martin Perez (10-6) gutted through 5 13 innings, giving up three runs on four hits before being replaced by Alexi Ogando.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.