MLB notebook: Mets' Harvey convinced he can pitch this season
• No matter what the Mets think, Matt Harvey is convinced he can pitch this season. New York's ace had elbow ligament-replacement surgery Oct. 22 and hasn't thrown a baseball from more than 60 feet off flat ground. New York doesn't expect him to return until 2015. Harvey went 9-5 with a 2.27 ERA and was the NL starter in last year's All-Star Game at Citi Field.
• Jonathon Niese was relieved to be back at spring training with the Mets after receiving a relatively good medical report. The left-hander had a MRI of his pitching elbow in New York on Monday, and the scan revealed he had inflammation but no damage to his ulnar collateral ligament.
• MLB.com reported Mariners right-hander Hisashi Iwakuma has been cleared by doctors to remove the splint from sprained middle right finger for the first time since camp opened five weeks ago. Iwakuma, 32, hasn't been able to grip a baseball since catching his hand in netting in Los Angeles just before spring training began.
• Astros pitcher Mark Appel, the first pick in the 2013 amateur draft, could be close to making his spring training debut following an appendectomy. The Pirates took Appel with the eighth pick in the 2012 draft, but he chose not to sign.
• The biggest buzz didn't come from a third straight positive outing by right-hander Michael Pineda in the Yankees' 8-1 victory over the Red Sox. That honor went to a swarm of bees that took over left field and delayed the game for seven minutes before the bottom of the third. Umpires called out the grounds crew, which chased the bees away with bug spray.
• Don Kelly (Mt. Lebanon) hit a grand slam, and Austin Jackson and Ian Kinsler also homered to lead a Tigers' split squad over the Blue Jays, 18-4.
— Wire reports
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.