MLB notebook: Report: Commissioner candidates down to three
• Major League Baseball identified three finalists to replace commissioner Bud Selig and will vote on the successor Aug. 14, a high-ranking MLB executive with direct knowledge of the hiring process told USA Today. The owners, according to the executive, will choose between Rob Manfred, MLB's chief operating officer; Tim Brosnan, MLB's executive vice president of business and Red Sox chairman Tom Werner.
• Brewers right-hander Matt Garza was placed on the 15-day disabled list, retroactive to Monday, with a left oblique strain. The Brewers have not announced a timetable for a potential return for Garza, who left his start early Sunday with the injury. Garza, 30, is 7-7 with a 3.58 ERA.
• Red Sox outfielder Shane Victorino will undergo surgery on his lower back Tuesday, and the operation likely means the end of his season. Victorino has played in just 30 games this year, spending three stints on the disabled list.
• Yankees starter CC Sabathia said he had a bone spur removed from his right knee when he had season-ending surgery on his right knee last Thursday. But the 34-year-old left-hander also said a more serious microfracture surgery has been ruled out and expressed confidence that he'll be healthy enough to pitch for the Yankees next season.
• Adding a third left-hander to a suddenly shaky relief corps, the Nationals claimed Matt Thornton off waivers from the Yankees. The 37-year-old Thornton went 0-3 with a 2.55 ERA in 24 2⁄3 innings across 46 appearances with the Yankees this season.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.