ShareThis Page

Colin Kaepernick, others Tweet support for ESPN's Jemele Hill amid Trump controversy

Frank Carnevale
| Wednesday, Sept. 13, 2017, 1:09 p.m.
Jemele Hill attends ESPN: The Party 2017 held on Friday, Feb. 3, 2017, in Houston, Texas. (Photo by John Salangsang/Invision/AP)
John Salangsang/Invision/AP
Jemele Hill attends ESPN: The Party 2017 held on Friday, Feb. 3, 2017, in Houston, Texas. (Photo by John Salangsang/Invision/AP)
ESPN “SportsCenter” anchor Jemele Hill.
ESPN “SportsCenter” anchor Jemele Hill.

Jemele Hill, a co-host of the 6 p.m. broadcast of ESPN's "SportsCenter," got into a controversy over comments she posted on Twitter calling President Donald Trump "a white supremacist" and "a bigot."

On Monday night, in a series of exchanges with other Twitter users, Hill said, "Donald Trump is a white supremacist who has largely surrounded himself w/ other white supremacists."

ESPN posted a statement trying to distance the company from her comments .

"The comments on Twitter from Jemele Hill regarding the president do not represent the position of ESPN," the network tweeted Tuesday from its public relations department's account. "We have addressed this with Jemele and she recognizes her actions were inappropriate."

But several athletes and people in the media took to Twitter to voice support for the anchor, including unemployed NFL quarterback Colin Kaepernick , who posted "We are with you (at)jemelehill."

Colin Kaepernick, NFL quarterback.

Reggie Miller, former NBA player and currently game analyst for TNT.

Some members of the media also took to Twitter to voice their support for Hill.

Greg Howard, New York Times reporter.

Michael David Smith, Pro Football Talk Managing Editor.

Cari Champion, ESPN anchor.

Gabrielle Union, actress.

But some former ESPNers didn't feel the same way.

Curt Schilling, former MLB pitcher and ESPN baseball analyst.

Britt Henry, former ESPN reporter.

How do you feel about her comments?

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.