ShareThis Page

Harris: Priorities out of whack at Rutgers

| Wednesday, June 5, 2013, 12:04 a.m.
Julie Hermann listens as Rutgers president Robert Barchi announces Hermann as athletic director May 15, 2013, in Piscataway, N.J.
Julie Hermann listens as Rutgers president Robert Barchi announces Hermann as athletic director May 15, 2013, in Piscataway, N.J.

Mike Rice.

Tim Pernetti.

Eddie Jordan.

Now Julie Hermann.

Hermann's recent hiring is the fourth avoidable scandal occurring in Rutgers' athletic department within the past two months. This is beginning to look more like an epidemic than a string of unfortunate personnel moves.

University president Robert Barchi had the final say each time.

“It's coming straight from the top. The head of the university is making this call,” Ramogi Huma, president of the National College Players Association, told me Monday. “It speaks to a culture where presidents and athletic directors are not used to having accountability to anybody.”

It was Barchi who didn't fire Rice until video of the men's basketball coach's physical and verbal abuse of his basketball players went viral. It was Barchi who waited to fire Pernetti — the athletic director who hired Rice — until doing anything else would have placed his own career in peril.

It was Barchi who also hired Jordan, a former basketball star at Rutgers and longtime NBA coach, to replace Rice — only to have it revealed that Jordan never graduated from Rutgers, contrary to Jordan's biography on the athletic department's website.

And, finally, it was Barchi who signed off on hiring Hermann to replace Pernetti and, boy, does Barchi wish he could take that one back.

It isn't as if Rutgers is just any old athletic program hiring any old athletic director. No, Rutgers is a school in the crosshairs after the Rice debacle and the Pernetti mess of its own doing. A school that when you say, “Rutgers,” people who don't know the first thing about Rutgers, are likely to respond, “That's the school with the crazy basketball coach.”

Barchi knew he needed to make a good AD hire and stay out of the news, but even that was asking too much.

A former UCLA football player, Huma founded the NCPA to look after the rights of student-athletes. He's also a board member in the Former College Athletes Association, which would likely have the authority to disperse settlement money in the “O'Bannon v. NCAA” antitrust lawsuit. On June 20, a federal judge will determine if the case can proceed as a class-action lawsuit.

Huma said the NCPA is closely monitoring the Rutgers situation, which he believes is symptomatic of big-time college athletics and ignores the rights of student-athletes.

“This is the second time Barchi has shown his incompetence,” Huma said. “We called for his firing the first time when he didn't bother to look at the video when student-athletes were abused. It's hard to believe he wouldn't take the time to watch the video of a history professor accused of abusing a student.”

With all of the available candidates for a prestigious position such as the athletic director at Rutgers, Barchi whiffed yet again.

Not only did he overlook the potential public relations disaster that is the byproduct of hiring Hermann, he compounded his mistake when he stubbornly defended the hire.

Think about the message Barchi is sending his student-athletes — the ones who generate millions of dollars playing football and basketball for the university — so he can continue to take them for granted.

So what that Hermann, hired to replace Pernetti, resigned after all 15 players on her volleyball team at Tennessee wrote a letter accusing her of abusive behavior, or that there were two lawsuits during her tenure at Tennessee and Louisville?

What's worse than Barchi not knowing about Hermann's unsavory past and hiring her? Knowing her past, and still making the controversial hire.

Wait, it gets worse.

Last week, Tara Sullivan, a sports columnist for The Record (N.J.), quoting a source with direct knowledge of the hiring process, reported of a “sometimes secret” and “often rushed” selection process involving the 26-member advisory committee charged with hiring Hermann. In a statement in support of Hermann, Barchi said, “Rutgers was deliberate at every stage of this process.”

It all goes back to what Huma said about Barchi feeling like he's untouchable and can do no wrong.

Barchi just fired his men's basketball coach who verbally and physically abused his players. Why would he hire a new athletic director a couple of months later with a similar track record?

Did Barchi not learn from his first mistake, or does he simply not care how it looks?

“The environment in which this hire was made is not grounded in common sense,” Huma said. “You've got a school that is trying to recover from an embarrassing scandal. For the president to turn around and hire an athletic director who was accused of the same thing at another school just makes no sense.”

Unfortunately, in the world of big-time college athletics, where college presidents hire and fire coaches and athletic directors instead of running the university, it makes perfect sense.

John Harris is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @JHarris_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.