Share This Page

Peters native Alison Riske upsets 7th-seeded Kvitova at U.S. Open

| Saturday, Aug. 31, 2013, 12:33 p.m.
Alison Riske, a Peters native, returns a shot to seventh-seeded Petra Kvitova during the third round of the U.S. Open on Saturday, Aug. 31, 2013, in New York.
Peters Township native Alison Riske reacts after beating seventh-seeded Petra Kvitova in the third round of the 2013 U.S. Open on Saturday, Aug. 31, 2013.

NEW YORK — Serena Williams and Sloane Stephens are through to a highly anticipated matchup in the round of 16 at the U.S. Open, where they're joined by a less expected American, Alison Riske.

Maybe's Riske's run isn't that much of a surprise considering her recent surge. The 23-year-old Peters native came into the summer having never accomplished any of these feats: winning a match in a Grand Slam tournament, at a WTA Tour event on hard courts or against at top-10 foe.

She's now achieved all that, her latest breakthrough victory a rout of 2011 Wimbledon champ Petra Kvitova on Saturday. Riske won 6-3, 6-0, taking the last eight games against the seventh-seeded Czech, who was in bed with a fever the day before.

“I've got a new confidence in myself,” Riske said through tears in an on-court interview. “I believe that I belong here.”

Another young American, 21-year-old Christina McHale, was one game away from matching Riske in upsetting a former major champion to reach her first Grand Slam fourth round. McHale had a chance to serve out the match at 5-4 in the second set against 13th-seeded Ana Ivanovic, but the 2008 French Open champ broke back.

Ivanovic then saved two break points at 5-5, and she broke McHale's serve in the next game to clinch the second set.

Leading 5-4 in the third set, Ivanovic broke McHale again for a 4-6, 7-5, 6-4 victory in 2 hours, 26 minutes.

McHale has been ranked as high as 24th, but she'd slipped to No. 114 after a bout with mononucleosis.

For a moment, it appeared the United States would have three women under age 24 in the round of 16. It's still been a promising tournament for the generation of Americans who must succeed the Williams sisters.

“The world better watch out — we're coming after them,” Riske said.

She was 0-5 at major tournaments before Wimbledon this year but is 5-1 since. Riske just broke into the top 100 in late July; now she'll likely earn a top-60 ranking.

“It's really tough out here,” she said. “Every week isn't like this.”

She has always thrived on grass, making the third round at Wimbledon this year. Now she's starting to figure out the hard courts.

Kvitova said she tried to end points quickly, knowing she couldn't hold up through long rallies. But Riske stayed calm and played good defense, taking advantage of Kvitova's seven double-faults and 27 unforced errors.

“She moved quite well,” Kvitova said. “She pushed me to the back. That was tough for me.”

It's another frustrating finish at Flushing Meadows, the only major tournament at which Kvitova hasn't made the semifinals. Two years ago, she became the first reigning Wimbledon women's champion to lose her first U.S. Open match in the same season.

“My body wouldn't let me fight,” Kvitova said.

Riske was set to play for Vanderbilt in 2009 when a family friend who owns a chemical company offered to sponsor her. So she turned pro.

A year ago at this time, she was questioning the wisdom of that decision. Then she rejoined coach Yves Boulais.

“Once I got back with him, things kind of unfolded themselves,” Riske said. “I felt really comfortable. I knew that with the tennis I was playing that things were going to start coming together. I just didn't know when.”

Williams advanced after midnight Saturday morning, beating 78th-ranked Yaroslava Shvedova of Kazakhstan, 6-3, 6-1. The previous match in Arthur Ashe Stadium on Friday night lasted more than four hours: 2001 U.S. Open champion Lleyton Hewitt's 6-4, 5-7, 3-6, 7-6 (2), 6-1 comeback victory over 2009 champion Juan Martin del Potro.

Stephens advanced by beating 23rd-seeded Jamie Hampton, 6-1, 6-3 in another all-American matchup.

On the men's side, fourth-seeded David Ferrer downed 172nd-ranked qualifier Mikhail Kukushkin, 6-4, 6-3, 4-6, 6-4. And despite 26 aces and plenty of home-crowd support, 13th-seeded John Isner lost to 22nd-seeded Philipp Kohlschreiber in the U.S. Open's third round for the second consecutive year.

Kohlschreiber's 6-4, 3-6, 7-5, 7-6 (5) victory Saturday over the highest-ranked American means the host country has only one man left: 109th-ranked Tim Smyczek, whose third-round match is Sunday.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.