Survey: Half support banning youth tackle football
By Gary Horvath
Published: Thursday, Nov. 14, 2013, 7:18 p.m.
A survey released Thursday by Robert Morris' Polling Institute found that almost half of respondents supported banning youths from playing contact football before middle school and 2 in 5 people supported such a ban for teens prior to high school.
The survey comes as football is coming under fire because of potential health risks, including concussions.
The survey, conducted in October, polled 1,003 individuals, including males who played contact football and parents of children who have played. Of those polled, 40.5 percent supported banning youths from playing the sport prior to high school, and 47.6 percent were in support of a ban for youths before entering middle school.
Among the findings:
• Of those who had played the sport, 38.2 percent supported a ban prior to high school, 44.3 percent for a ban prior to middle school.
• Among parents whose children play, 41.2 percent supported a ban before high school and 46.6 percent supported one before middle school.
“We need to continue to educate athletes, parents, coaches and fans about the effects of concussions and raise awareness of best practices for prevention,” said Samantha Monda, an RMU sports psychologist.
Recent studies, however, have shown that youth football is the safest age for players, with a concussion rate of less than 4 percent, said Dr. Julian Bailes, chairman of the department of neurosurgery at the NorthShore Neurological Institute near Chicago. Bailes said the youth football concussion rate is less than 20 percent that of high school players.
“The No. 1 thing is that there is no scientific agreement that the youth brain is any more susceptible to injury than the adult brain,” Bailes said. “This trend of saying, ‘Yeah, we need to outlaw youth football' is not based on any factual data. It's an emotional stance.”
Gary Horvath is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Kovacevic: Big Ben’s contract clock ticking
- Duquesne crash leaves 1 injured
- FAA asks authority for updates
- SHOOTING FOR THE STARS IN UNIONTOWN
- Troop cuts worry vets in Fayette
- New Kensington-Arnold board debates dress code
- Talented center Sutter is proving to be ‘pretty important’ for Penguins
- With no money for upkeep, Prospect Cemetery Association board to disband
- Brackenridge may be required by law to maintain cemetery
- Westmoreland County Courthouse in Greensburg to be featured in TV series
- Western Pennsylvania engineer aboard missing Malaysia Airlines flight