Share This Page
NFL

Bears receiver causes stir, laughter concerning comments over Viagra

| Thursday, Nov. 29, 2012, 6:52 p.m.

CHICAGO — The idea that NFL players might use Viagra to gain an edge on the field left Chicago Bears linebacker Lance Briggs practically in tears — from laughing.

He wasn't the only one.

Players cracked jokes about it Thursday, a day after Bears star receiver Brandon Marshall said he had heard that some players were using Viagra and hoping it would give them an advantage during games. Punch lines aside, experts say it's unlikely the erectile-dysfunction drug would help.

“What would that do? That's the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard,” Minnesota Vikings long snapper Cullen Loeffler said.

Bears defensive back D.J. Moore wondered if Marshall was kidding and said: “I've never heard of that.”

NFL spokesman Greg Aiello said Viagra is not a banned substance and declined further comment.

Marshall started it all Wednesday when asked about a growing number of suspensions tied to amphetamines, including the ADHD drug Adderall.

He said he didn't know much about Adderall, but suggested Viagra could be viewed by players as an energy boost.

“I know guys, it's such a competitive league, and guys try anything just to get that edge,” he said.

“I've heard of guys using Viagra, seriously, because the blood, it's supposed to thin. I don't know. Some crazy stuff. It's kind of scary with some of these chemicals that are in some of these things, so you have to be careful.”

But using Viagra for more touchdowns and tackles?

“I didn't even know people could do that,” New York Giants tight end Martellus Bennett said. And his teammate Justin Tuck added: “I can't imagine why people would take steroids, so I have no comment on Viagra. Besides, my wife would be very upset with me.”

Arizona Cardinals defensive lineman Vonnie Holliday, a 15-year NFL veteran, said some of his teammates were talking about Marshall's Viagra remarks, but he had never heard of such a thing himself.

“I don't understand what good it would do,” he said.

Dr. Olivier Rabin, science director at the World Anti-Doping Agency in Montreal, said it is unlikely Viagra does anything to improve football performance in NFL players. He also said there is no evidence the drug might somehow mask the use of steroids or other performance-enhancing drugs.

Rabin noted that research in high altitudes found the drug helped improve oxygen flow in climbers with impaired lung function. That's because Viagra can dilate blood vessels, and vessels in the lung constrict in high altitudes.

University of Miami researcher Kevin Jacobs has studied Viagra in simulated high-altitude environments and “didn't find much benefit in young, healthy, active individuals.”

“No one has really tested it in football players doing exercise. Whatever benefit they think they're getting is probably more psychological than anything,” said Jacobs, an associate professor in the kinesiology and sport sciences department.

Marshall said he doesn't take medication “of any sort.”

“Any time you take anything over the counter, if you don't approve it with your training room, you can get popped,” he said.

“Some of it's fair, but some of it kind of puts you in a tough spot as a professional athlete.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.