NFL notebook: RGIII knee injury doesn't appear to be major
Redskins quarterback Robert Griffin III touches his back after a sack by Ravens defensive end Arthur Jones during the second half Sunday, Dec. 9, 2012, in Landover, Md. (AP)
Photo by AP
• Redskins quarterback Robert Griffin III sprained his right knee in the final minute of Sunday's game. The injury doesn't appear to be major. Griffin had an X-ray at the stadium, and doctors poking at his knee told him that his ligaments “felt good.” “I'm not a doctor, but I know what an ACL feels like,” Griffin said. “And it doesn't feel like an ACL. ... If I felt that, I'd be pretty nervous.” Griffin was limping and wearing a big brace on his knee in the locker room after the game.
• Bears quarterback Jay Cutler hurt his neck Sunday after taking a hit to the head in the fourth quarter. Cutler stayed in for the rest of the drive, but left the game afterward. He said his neck was bothering him all afternoon and worsened as the game went on, complaining of stiffness.
• Ravens guard Marshal Yanda sprained his right ankle and wore a black walking boot on his foot in the locker room. Linebacker Jameel McClain had a neck injury, but X-rays were negative. Fullback Vonta Leach sprained his ankle, and Ray Rice had a left hip pointer.
• Bill running back Fred Jackson injured his right leg and had to be carted off from the sideline. CoachChan Gailey would only say the injury didn't look good after the game.
• Chiefs receiver Dwayne Bowe injured his ribs in the first half and didn't return.
• 49ers defensive tackle Demarcus Dobbs went down with a right knee injury and was carted to the locker room.
• Cowboys defensive lineman Josh Brent was released from jail Sunday on $500,000 bond, one day after being charged with intoxication manslaughter after what police said was a drunken-driving accident that killed close friend and teammate Jerry Brown.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.