NFL notebook: Source says Ravens' Lewis will remain on injured reserve
The Ravens didn't remove Ray Lewis from the injured reserve Saturday, according to a person with knowledge of the decision.
Last week it was thought that Lewis, who tore his right triceps Oct. 14, would be activated as early as last weekend. But the linebacker won't be available for the ailing Ravens vs. the New York Giants on Sunday in Baltimore.
Ravens coach John Harbaugh said this week Lewis is “coming along” in his return to practice. The team is 4-4 since losing the 37-year-old, two-time NFL Defensive Player of the Year.
The Ravens (9-5) have lost three in a row while suffering several injuries which have hampered the defense.
Linebacker Jameel McClain was placed on the injured reserve with a spine injury, and linebacker Adrian Hamilton was promoted from the practice squad to the 53-man roster. McClain joins cornerback Lardarius Webb on IR.
If inside linebacker Dannell Ellerbe's injured ankle keeps him out of a fourth game in a row, reserves Josh Bynes and Brendon Ayanbadejo are expected to start at the inside linebacker positions in Baltimore's 3-4 defense.
Jaguars linebacker Smith returns
The Jaguars activated linebacker Daryl Smith from injured reserve and placed safety Dwight Lowery on IR with a foot injury.
Smith likely will start Sunday's game against New England.
Smith missed the first 14 games of the season because of a groin injury. He was placed on IR on Oct. 25, with the designation to return.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.