Cowher will be back ... eventually
Six seasons have passed since Bill Cowher walked away from the Steelers, and 2013 likely will make it seven. But the CBS analyst and former coach said Tuesday that he probably will return to the NFL — eventually.
“It would be a challenge,” he said of the layoff since he last coached, “but I think that's probably why I would get back into it, because of the challenge.”
So he does plan to go back at some point?
“Yeah,” he said.
The question, of course, is when. Has Cowher been tempted by the current NFL openings or heard from the teams who have them?
“No, no, no, no,” he said at an event to promote CBS' coverage of Super Bowl XLVII. “Hey, we have the Super Bowl. All these coaches are trying to get there. I know I'm going to be there.”
Cowher would be a hot commodity any time he signaled a willingness to return. When he's ready, he's convinced the layoff will be a “non-issue.”
“I did it for 27 years,” he said. “One thing about this job is it's been really good because it allows me to study the game and do features on the game. ... It's not like I'm out of it. I know how the game is changing.”
If the Jets falter next season, Cowher naturally would be a popular choice to replace Rex Ryan. In that scenario, quarterback Mark Sanchez presumably would be on his way out, too.
But Cowher believes Sanchez is salvageable. Cowher noted everything from a lack of skill position players to problems on the line to the failure of Tony Sparano's system to click to Sanchez's “fragile” confidence to, of course, the backup quarterback.
“You bring in Tim Tebow and create this whole circus kind of atmosphere,” Cowher said. “I mean, as everyone has talked about, that thing was doomed from Day 1. They never really had a chance to succeed.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.