Home sure is sweet to Patriots
By The Associated Press
Published: Thursday, Jan. 17, 2013, 9:26 p.m.
FOXBOROUGH, Mass. — Home sweet home. Sure works for the Patriots in the AFC title game.
New England gets a chance to extend its mastery in the final step to the Super Bowl on Sunday against Baltimore, the team the Patriots beat a year ago for the conference crown. That win made them 4-0 in home conference title games.
Although they were more vulnerable at home than usual during the 2012 regular season, losing to Arizona and San Francisco and having tight games with Buffalo and the Jets, the Patriots (13-4) are happy not to be heading to Baltimore (12-6) this weekend. Or anywhere else.
“Everything is on deck,” Patriots Pro Bowl defensive tackle Vince Wilfork said. “You have to put everything you have into this game. If you lose you go home, plain and simple.”
But the Patriots are at home, where they've been beaten in early-round games, including against the Ravens, 33-14, three years ago. At this stage, though, no way.
That success rate for the AFC championship doesn't fool Wilfork into feeling complacent. Just the opposite.
“This team always plays us tough,” Wilfork added. “This team has been in the playoffs on the road and won a lot of games. They won here in the playoffs. We have to be able to prepare well and execute very well at a high level. I don't think we can (leave) no stone unturned in this game, because if we do it could cost us.”
The Patriots are one of the NFL's best home teams, going 73-15 since Gillette Stadium opened in 2002, including 10-2 in the postseason. Many of those games have been routs.
But the Ravens are 8-5 in road playoffs, including their upset of the Broncos in double overtime last Saturday in an equally tough venue.
And there's no reason to fear a trip to Foxborough, where no one has fared better in the playoffs.
Last January, they were an incompletion in the end zone in the final minute — Sterling Moore stripped the ball from Lee Evans after the Ravens receiver had both hands on it — from winning. And then they botched a 32-yard field goal that would have forced overtime.
“These are two of the top teams for a long time now and we know each other very well,” Ravens star linebacker Ray Lewis said. “It's that chess match; they are going to make plays and we are going to. It's always one play here or there and who makes the last play will win.”
That's something Lewis revels in as he makes a final run for a second championship before retiring when the Ravens are done.
“Both sides understand the game of football,” he said. “There have been some great, great rivalries and we have one of those going on with New England now.”
Baltimore won at home, 31-30, in Week 3, which seems like eons ago. The Ravens were contending for the AFC's top seed until losing four of their last five.
That dropped them out of a bye position, too, which New England grabbed. But the Ravens beat Indianapolis at home in the wild-card round, then stunned Denver.
“I think you always want to play at home. We want to play at home. We've got great fans and it's a great atmosphere,” Ravens center Matt Birk said. “I'd say it's certainly an advantage, but that's the way it is. Ultimately it's not going to decide the outcome of the game.”
Overall, the Ravens are 2-7 vs. New England, including 1-5 at Foxborough. Their defeats in five of the last six meetings were by a combined 16 points.
Wilfork doesn't care about history, recent or otherwise.
“This is going to be a battle,” he said. “Both teams deserve to be at this level. You have the two best teams in the AFC playing.
“It just goes to show you the consistency of these teams. Every year it always seems like we are in it and they are in it and it just comes down to a couple of plays.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- NFL notebook: Cardinals hire Roger Kingdom as speed coach
- Former Steel Valley, Pitt star Ezell eyes WWE if NFL doesn’t work out
- NFL notebook: Browns cut troubled WR Bess
- NFL notebook: League may experiment with 42-yard PAT
- Former Steelers assistant Hughes revered for hiring acumen in NFL
- Former Pitt defensive lineman Donald dominates NFL Combine
- NFL notebook: Dolphins’ Incognito seeking psychiatric help