LAS VEGAS — If the Baltimore Ravens are to become Super Bowl champions, they'll have to beat the odds again to do it.
Bookmakers in this gambling city mostly have the San Francisco 49ers as 4 1⁄2-point favorites over the Ravens in the Super Bowl, amid expectations this could be the heaviest bet title game ever.
“It's a monster matchup, brother versus brother,” William Hill oddsmaker Jimmy Vaccaro said. “I believe it will top last year's Super Bowl handle and could go higher.”
“We've got money coming in as we speak, it looks like it will be good on both sides,” said LVH book director Jay Kornegay.
Baltimore already is the first underdog of more than a touchdown to win both the division and championship playoff rounds. The Ravens were 7 1⁄2-point underdogs to the Patriots before beating them, 28-13, Sunday.
“The Ravens are the hot team now, but they're not getting a lot of support from the public,” Kornegay said. “These are very similar teams, both can run the ball well, play smashmouth football and have two quarterbacks playing very good football.”
Last year's game between the New York Giants and the Patriots drew $93.9 million in wagers in Nevada, just under the record $94.5 million bet in 2006 when the Steelers beat the Seattle Seahawks, 21-10. Those who follow the betting industry closely say hundreds of millions of dollars — possibly even billions — will be bet on the game by the time the offshore sports books and illegal bookmakers take in their share.
Like the LVH, some books in Las Vegas opened the game at 4 1⁄2 points, while others put their number up at 5.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.