Share This Page
NFL

NFL Notebook: Horton defends Rooney Rule process

| Tuesday, Jan. 29, 2013, 7:26 p.m.

• Browns defensive coordinator Ray Horton said he was “disappointed” at not getting a head coaching job, but believes the NFL's policy for promoting minority candidates works. Horton, who spent the past two seasons with Arizona, interviewed with several teams for head coaching vacancies this offseason. The former Steelers assistant said he respects the process — and the league's Rooney Rule — and believes owners hired coaches they felt gave their teams the best chance to win. Minority candidates were shut out of 15 coaching and top front-office jobs this offseason.

• Falcons owner Arthur Blank has been courted by business interests in Los Angeles about bringing the NFL back to the nation's No. 2 media market, according to an NFL.com report. Blank reportedly shared the information with two unnamed Atlanta city council members in a meeting with Georgia state officials to discuss a new open-air stadium in downtown Atlanta.

• Former Jets GM Mike Tannenbaum took responsibility for the Tim Tebow trade, ESPN reported. “Ultimately that was my decision to trade for Tim,” Tannenbaum said in his first interview since being fired.

• The Rams decided not to hire Rob Ryan as defensive coordinator.

• The Bills will play one regular-season game per year at Toronto's Rogers Centre for the next five seasons.

• The speaker of the North Carolina House said there's a fear the Panthers could move if they don't get financial help to upgrade Bank of America Stadium. The Panthers want to renovate the 74,000-seat stadium in Charlotte.

• A federal court in Philadelphia will hear arguments in April on motions to dismiss lawsuits filed by thousands of former NFL players about concussions.

­—Wire reports

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.