NFL notebook: Raiders quarterback Pryor doesn't practice, NFLPA investigating
ALAMEDA, Calif. — After being beaten out for starting gigs the past two preseasons in Seattle and Oakland, Matt Flynn could start this week for the Raiders with Jeannette native Terrelle Pryor recovering from a concussion.
Pryor has not been cleared to return to practice yet after getting hurt late in Monday night's loss in Denver. He was knocked out on a helmet-to-helmet hit by linebacker Wesley Woodyard on a quarterback draw.
Pryor remained in the game for two plays after the hit as coach Dennis Allen said he showed no signs of a concussion in the immediate aftermath. NFL spokesman Brian McCarthy said all indications are that the Raiders handled the situation properly.
ESPN reported that the NFL Players Association is investigating whether the team followed the league protocol in dealing with Pryor's injury.
• Less than five seasons after declaring Josh Freeman was the future of the Buccaneers, the struggling franchise is tying its hopes to another rookie quarterback. Coach Greg Schiano benched Freeman in favor of untested Mike Glennon two days after insisting the former first-round draft pick remained the starter.
•A medical examiner near Atlanta said former Chargers safety Paul Oliver committed suicide. Cobb County investigators say the 29-year-old Oliver was found dead Tuesday night.
• Ravens Pro Bowl running back Ray Rice returned to practice Wednesday on a limited basis and is expected to play Sunday against the Bills. Rice sat out the Ravens' 30-9 win over the Houston Texans last Sunday due to a left hip flexor strain.
— Wire reports
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.