NFL notebook: QB Freeman could choose team by Monday
• Quarterback Josh Freeman signed a one-year, $3 million contract with the Vikings on Sunday night, according to ESPN and other media outlets. Freeman had been contacted by 8 to 10 teams since his release from the Buccaneers on Thursday, according to CBSsports.com. In 60 career games, Freeman has thrown for 13,534 yards, 80 touchdowns and 66 interceptions. It's unclear how he fits with Matt Cassel and Christian Ponder already on the Vikings' roster. Freeman was a first-round pick in 2009 and is the Bucs' career leader in touchdown passes.
• The 49ers were interested in free agent defensive lineman Richard Seymour, multiple media outlets reported. Seymour and the 49ers could not agree to terms in September, according to CBSSports.com. The Lions and Falcons are also reportedly interested in the 34-year-old.
• The Raiders plan to work out free-agent quarterback David Carr on Monday, according to NFL.com. Starter Terrelle Pryor (Jeannette) was expected to play Sunday night against the Chargers after missing last week's game with a concussion. Undrafted rookie Matt McGloin was moved up to the backup spot, and Matt Flynn was dropped to third on the depth chart.
• The Titans contacted former No. 1 overall draft pick JaMarcus Russell after starting quarterback Jake Locker was injured, ESPN reported. Russell was reportedly interested in joining the team but can't because of a knee injury he sustained during the summer.
• Jaguars rookie offensive tackle Luke Joeckel will miss the rest of the season because of a broken right ankle. Joeckel was injured in the first quarter of a 34-20 loss to the Rams.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.