NFL notebook: Barring setback, Vikings' Peterson ready to go
• Vikings running back Adrian Peterson returned to practice Friday and is expected to play Sunday at Cincinnati as long as he doesn't have any setbacks with his sprained right foot. The league's second-leading rusher, Peterson is listed as questionable for Sunday. “I'm looking forward to playing this week,” Peterson said. “Get another day to rest, which is going to be good. As far as the foot goes, I'll be ready to go.”
• Broncos slot receiver Wes Welker was ruled out Sunday against Houston. He also is expected to be held out of the Broncos' regular-season finale at Oakland as a precaution against a third head injury this month.
• The Chiefs will have dangerous punt returner Dexter McCluster back from his ankle infection injury when they play the Colts on Sunday.
• Ravens quarterback Joe Flacco is questionable for the game against the Patriots with a knee injury.
• Lions tight end Brandon Pettigrew has been ruled out Sunday against the Giants. Pettigrew hurt an ankle during Detroit's loss to Baltimore on Monday night.
• Rams rookie wide receiver rookie Tavon Austin (WVU) missed his sixth straight day of practice with a left ankle injury and is questionable.
• Browns cornerback Joe Haden returned to practice after missing two days with a bruised hip and could play against the Jets.
• The Seahawks will be without starting right guard J.R. Sweezy for Sunday's game against Arizona after he suffered a concussion last week.
• Eagles quarterback Nick Foles was fined $10,000 for an illegal peel-back block on Minnesota's Erin Henderson. Arizona's Marcus Benard was fined $15,750 for roughing the passer on a hit on Tennessee's Ryan Fitzpatrick.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.