NFL notebook: Lawsuit alleges Eli Manning, Giants sold fake 'game-used' gear
• A sports collector Wednesday filed a lawsuit against Giants quarterback Eli Manning and other members of the franchise, including CEOJohn Mara, alleging they participated in selling fake “game-used” Super Bowl jerseys and other memorabilia so they could keep the originals for themselves, according to a New York Post report. The list of those allegedly fake items includes a helmet that Manning supposedly wore in the Giants' 2008 Super Bowl victory over the Patriots, which is now on display at the Pro Football Hall of Fame.
• Jonathan Martin sent explicit text messages to Richie Incognito, threatening to “kill (his) whole family,” Incognito's attorney Mark Schamel said, according to a Miami Herald report. But Incognito never felt in any danger because he saw the text messages as “banter between friends, not bullying,” Schamel said. All of these explosive messages were given to NFL investigator Ted Wells and presumably will be included in his report on the Dolphins' workplace conduct scandal.
• The Bills added to their coaching staff by naming Bethel Park native Jim Hostler a senior offensive assistant. Hostler spent the past six seasons as a wide receivers coach with the Ravens.
• The NFL will launch a new digital video service this summer, seeking to increase revenue from the growing mobile advertising market. The league announced “NFL Now” will offer game highlights, archived NFL Films footage and original news and analysis programs. Basic content will be free on smartphones, tablets, computers and some consoles and streaming devices.
• Nick Eason, who played on two Super Bowl teams with the Steelers from 2007-10, was hired as a Titans assistant defensive line coach under new head coach Ken Whisenhunt.
— Wire reports
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.