NFL notebook: Redskins, lawmakers sparring over team nickname
The latest back-and-forth over the Redskins name includes a stern letter from two lawmakers and a new “community voices” campaign from the team.
A letter sent Monday from Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.) and Rep. Tom Cole (R-Okla.) tells NFL commissioner Roger Goodell that the league is on “the wrong side of history” and mentions the league's tax-exempt status. Cantwell chairs the Senate Committee on Indian Affairs.
The lawmakers specifically objected to Goodell's Super Bowl week news conference, when he said the Redskins name has been “presented in a way that honors Native Americans.”
“It is, in fact, an insult to Native Americans,” the letter states.
NFL spokesman Greg Aiello said the league will respond to the letter “in an appropriate manner” once it has been reviewed.
Williams back with ‘Skins
Doug Williams is returning to the Redskins to work in the front office. The team said the quarterback, who led the team to the Super Bowl title in the 1987 season, will serve as a personnel executive.
Vikings add Fraley to staff
The Vikings hired Robert Morris product Hank Fraley as an assistant offensive line coach.
The Colts waived offensive lineman Justin Anderson. ... The Lions hired Jim Bob Cooter as quarterbacks coach. ... The Jaguars hired Robert Saleh as linebackers coach and Scottie Hazelton as assistant linebackers coach.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.