ShareThis Page

Trio of tackles loom large on draft day

| Friday, May 2, 2014, 11:21 p.m.

In the 1974 draft in which the Steelers landed four Hall of Famers, 14 of the 26 first-round picks were defensive linemen or linebackers. Only one was an offensive lineman.

Oh, how priorities have changed. Last year, the top two picks, three of the top four and nine in the round were offensive linemen, led by tackles Eric Fisher and Luke Joeckel.

With teams desperate to protect quarterbacks who carry $120 million price tags, expect the run on offensive linemen to continue Thursday. Three tackles — Greg Robinson, Jake Matthews and Taylor Lewan — should be off the board within the first 10 picks.

“It was a big boy draft (in 2013),” NFL Network analyst Charles Davis said. “This year, I would say the three offensive tackles that are consensus at the top of the board are rated higher than the two that went 1-2 last year.”

With defense such a priority to them, the Steelers likely won't go for an offensive lineman early on unless a top-rated one slides to them. But, unlike 1974, offensive linemen don't slide far these days.

Alan Robinson is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @arobinson_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.