Notre Dame's TJ Jones catches a touchdown pass in front of Pitt's K'Waun Williams during the third quarter Saturday, Nov. 9, 2013, at Heinz Field. Photo by Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
By Alan Robinson| Saturday, May 3, 2014, 9:00 p.m.
No position in the 2014 NFL Draft is more important to the Steelers than cornerback.
Ike Taylor is returning at age 34 for much less money. William Gay had to start ahead of Cortez Allen in 2013.
And as NFL offensive coordinators and QBs up the ante in the passing game each season, an opponent without two competent corners doesn't stand a chance.
This cornerbacks group is considered to be deep and talented but with no consensus No. 1. Darqueze Dennard is this guy's No. 1, Justin Gilbert is that guy's and the fast-rising Bradley Roby and Kyle Fuller might end up going ahead of Dennard or Gilbert.
If the Steelers go for a cornerback with the No. 15 pick — and that seems probable — they likely will get a good player. But picking the right player out of this crowded-at-the-top group could be as important to a defense as choosing the right quarterback out of the Johnny Manziel-Blake Bortles-Teddy Bridgewater mix is to an offense.
The Steelers, after all, once took future Hall of Fame cornerback Rod Woodson in the first round, but another time, they took the highly disappointing Deon Figures.
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.