NFL teams will be in good hands with this year's receiver class
ADVANCE FOR WEEKEND EDITIONS, MAY 3-4 - FILE - In this Nov. 14, 2013, file photo, Clemson wide receiver Sammy Watkins races in for a 44-yard touchdown while being pursued by Georgia Tech's Jemea Thomas during the second half of an NCAA college football game in Clemson, S.C. Watkins is Clemson's career leader in receptions (240) and yards receiving (3,391). He is a top prospect in the upcoming NFL draft. (AP Photo/Richard Shiro, File) Photo by AP
By Alan Robinson| Tuesday, May 6, 2014, 9:00 p.m.
It's rapidly becoming one of football's most-used cliches: Wide receivers so fast and talented they can take a top off a defense.
Well, this wide receiver group is about to take the top off the NFL Draft. There are guesstimates that as many as a half-dozen receivers could go in the first round, and a dozen in the first two rounds.
The two best-in-class — Sammy Watkins of Clemson and Mike Evans of Texas A&M — might have been the No. 1 overall player in past drafts, including last year's.
If there's any sure prediction in advance of the Thursday-Saturday draft, it's that Steelers will take a wide receiver, almost certainly early on.
But given the vagaries of every draft, and the players who rise and fall without explanation, part of the pre-draft intrigue is by which round the Steelers will decide they can't wait any longer.
“This is a draft that the receiver position ... if you're a team in need, you'll be very pleased at some of the players you're going to get,” NFL Network analyst Daniel Jeremiah said.
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.