Penn State WR Robinson goes to Jacksonville
Penn State wide receiver Allen Robinson was the first of three players from district schools drafted Friday night when he was selected in the second round (61st overall) by the Jacksonville Jaguars.
He was the 11th wide receiver taken in the first two rounds, including his new teammate, USC's Marqise Lee, who was selected early in the second round (39th overall) by the Jaguars.
Two West Virginia players were chosen in the third round.
The Tampa Bay Buccaneers selected running back Charles Sims, who scored 51 touchdowns for two schools, with the 69th overall selection.
Defensive end Will Clarke, 6-6, 271, went to the Kansas City Chiefs at 88. Clarke is a graduate of Allderdice.
Robinson (6-foot-2, 220 pounds), who left Penn State with a year of eligibility remaining, was a two-year starter for the Nittany Lions. He caught a school-record 77 passes for 1,018 yards and 11 touchdowns as a sophomore in 2012.
He broke his records last season with 97 receptions for 1,432 yards and six touchdowns while being named a third-team All-American.
Sims, 6-0, 214, played one season at West Virginia (2013), rushing for 1,095 yards and 11 touchdowns and catching 45 passes for 401 and three scores after transferring from Houston.
During his three seasons at Houston, he gained 2,370 yards and had 29 touchdowns on the ground and caught 158 passes for 1,707 and eight scores.
“He's as good a receiver out of the backfield as any running back in this draft,” NFL Network analyst Mike Mayock said.
Jerry DiPaola is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at firstname.lastname@example.org or via Twitter @JDiPaola_Trib.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.