NFL notebook: Leagues join to evaluate concussions
NEW YORK — Medical officials from the NFL, FIFA and other sports organizations are banding together to look into better ways to identify, manage and treat concussions.
The “think tank,” funded by an educational grant from the NFL, was Sunday and Monday at league headquarters in New York.
Dozens of scientific and medical personnel from football, rugby and equestrian circles participated.
Dr. Rich Ellenbogen, chairman of the NFL's head, neck and spine committee, said the various sports organizations “need to look at all variations of what is being done around the world.”
More meetings are planned, perhaps as soon as later this year.
League suspends safety
The NFL suspended Redskins safety Brandon Meriweather for a blow to the head of an opponent, which is his sixth violation of player safety rules.
Meriweather will miss the first two regular-season games for his helmet-to-helmet hit on receiver Torrey Smith during Saturday night's game against the Ravens.
Around the league
The Buccaneers will meet with Richie Incognito to determine if one of the central figures in the Dolphins bullying scandal can help their offensive line. ESPN.com reported the league has cleared Incognito for all regular-season activity, a league source said. The website said several teams are interested in Incognito. ... The Jets indefinitely suspended cornerback Dimitri Patterson after he left the team for 48 hours without contacting the organization. ... Vikings coach Mike Zimmer named Matt Cassel as his starting quarterback.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.