ShareThis Page

NFL notebook: Ex-player Gilbert releases platform for NFLPA bid

| Tuesday, Aug. 26, 2014, 8:24 p.m.

Sean Gilbert on Tuesday unveiled the platform that he will stand upon in trying to oust NFL Players Association executive director DeMaurice Smith during the next election in March.

The 44-year-old former Aliquippa and Pitt defensive tackle would move to terminate the current collective bargaining agreement on the grounds of collusion.

Gilbert, a former NFL defensive lineman who once sat out a whole season amid a contract dispute, would raise the minimum player salary to $1 million. He would also support an 18-game regular season in the name of generating more revenue.

“This is about principle and passion,” he said.

Nearly a year since he publicly revealed his intent to pursue Smith's job, Gilbert shared more details during a media conference call regarding the nuts-and-bolts of his mission.

Wresting power from Smith, who was elected in 2009 and re-elected to a three-year term in 2012, will be daunting in another sense: Gilbert must sway a rank-and-file membership that typically takes its lead from player reps and the board of directors.

• The Buccaneers addressed a need to upgrade their struggling offensive line by obtaining six-time Pro Bowl guard Logan Mankins from the Patriots for tight end Tim Wright and a draft pick.

• Raiders cornerback DJ Hayden will miss at least the first six weeks of the season after being placed on the physically unable to perform list with a stress fracture in his right foot.

Thad Lewis is out and Jordan Palmer is in following the Bills' late preseason shuffle of backup quarterbacks.

• The Broncos acquired first-year kicker Brandon McManus from the Giants for a conditional seventh-round pick in 2015, and released rookie kickerMitch Ewald.

• The Seahawks will forfeit two days of on-field minicamp practices next offseason after being penalized by the league for excessive physical contact during their 2014 minicamp.

— Wire reports

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.