The NHL will resume negotiations with its Players Association Wednesday in New York.
Although members of the two sides spoke on Tuesday, no negotiations were held.
Members of the NHL and NHLPA met for about two hours Monday night.
The NHL expressed disappointment that Don Fehr, the NHLPA executive director, did not provide a new proposal even though he called for meetings to take place this week.
Many of the Penguins — and a former Penguins forward — are hoping for good news from New York later this week.
“If we lose another entire season,” said Tampa Bay left wing Ryan Malone, “then shame on all of us.”
Malone, who is visiting his family in Pittsburgh this week for Thanksgiving, remains close with center Sidney Crosby and a number of other Penguins.
Like his former teammates, Malone is hoping for good news.
“This whole thing is crazy,” said Malone, who has already missed one season because of a labor dispute. “You just kind of keep waiting for good news.”
Although the NHLPA had internal meetings with Fehr on Monday night and Tuesday, it remains unknown if it will make a new, complete proposal when the sides meet Wednesday.
“I think we (NHLPA officials) are meeting internally right now to decide if we're going to propose something at the next meeting,” Penguins defenseman Matt Niskanen said. “I think the plan all along was to move this thing forward. I hope that happens in the next couple of days.”
According to Penguins player representative Craig Adams, Monday's meeting touched on “economic issues and contracting.”
Josh Yohe is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org or 412-664-9161 Ext. 1975.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.