Complications grow in NHL labor dispute
The NHL labor situation appeared to slide backwards Thursday.
It featured another vote that could lead to disbanding the Players' Association, another lawsuit, federally mediated meetings and negotiations focused on revenue and players' pensions.
There also was the customary lack of significant movement toward a new labor contract that would end a nearly four-month lockout.
NHL commissioner Gary Bettman's deadline to save the season is Jan. 11.
Two big issues — pensions and the cap ceiling — are preventing a deal between owners and players, multiple sources said.
The pension dispute, in particular, is a significant sticking point with the union, the sources said. The union believed it had an agreement on pensions after two days of meetings on Dec. 4-5 in New York.
The NHL and NHLPA also disagree on a salary-cap reduction in Year 2 of a new deal.
The NHL is adamant that the cap be $60 million in 2013-14. The union wants no less than $65 million. The cap for the 2013 season would be around $70 million.
Common ground was reached Thursday on a definition of revenue, which will be split 50-50 on any new labor contract, the sources said.
The sides have traded proposals several times since face-to-face bargaining resumed Monday in New York. A federal mediator was part of negotiations Thursday, though union executive director Donald Fehr was not part of that session, the sources said.
Second disclaimer vote
More than 700 players began voting at 6 p.m. Thursday to authorize their union executive board to file a disclaimer of interest with the U.S. Department of Labor. They have 48 hours to complete the vote.
If two-thirds of players vote in favor, the executive board could immediately dissolve the union and open the league to antitrust lawsuits from players.
Fehr would no longer represent a disbanded union.
Players conducted the same vote from Dec. 16-21, but the union allowed a midnight Wednesday deadline to pass without filing the disclaimer.
Jared Simmer, an adjunct public policy professor at Carnegie Mellon, said the NHL viewed the disclaimer of interest as “a real threat,” citing recent revised proposals from the league.
In response to a league lawsuit, the union brought action Thursday in the U.S. District Court of Southern New York. The NHLPA seeks to dismiss a class-action complaint from Dec. 14, arguing the NHL's claim of an impending disclaimer of interest filing was “hypothetical.”
League and union officials declined to comment.
Emily Town, who specializes in employment law with Stember Feinstein Doyle Payne & Kravec in Downtown, said the union contends there was no “actual controversy” raised in the NHL lawsuit because the NHLPA never filed a disclaimer of interest.
The NHL has until 5 p.m. Monday to file a response to the union lawsuit, sources said.
The local legal experts said the union's maneuvering Thursday should not prevent the sides from reaching a deal.
Simmer said he expected a deal “at the midnight hour.”
“If there is a settlement, look for one closer to the drop-dead date the league had previously announced,” Simmer said. “That allows both parties to claim that they fought as hard as they could to get the best deal under the circumstances.”
The lockout dates to Sept. 15, and games are canceled through Jan. 14. Training camps must open Jan. 12 for a 48-game season to begin a week later, Bettman said.
Several NHL players have taken to social media to announce they are returning to North America after playing with European teams, though Penguins' league MVP and scoring champion Evgeni Malkin said he will wait to leave Russia's Kontinental Hockey League until the league publicly confirms a start date for training camps.
Penguins players added an extra day to their Southpointe practices this week.
“We're just trying to be patient for the next 10 days here, and we'll see what happens,” defenseman Brooks Orpik said.
Note: Penguins defenseman Kris Letang will soon be in Russia to play for SKA St. Petersburg of the KHL. Letang has agreed to terms to play with that club for the duration of the NHL lockout.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.